SG govt should ease restrictions on freedom of expression

QX179R SG

Singapore’s government should ease restrictions on freedom of expression instead of making excuses not to do so, a US-based human rights group said on Tuesday.

In its annual report released on Monday which assessed progress on human rights in more than 90 countries over the past year, the Human Rights Watch (HRW) pointed out how the government had either dismissed or contested the recommendations to improve its civil and political liberties made by the United Nations Human Rights Council’s Universal Periodic Review (UPR) process in May last year.

The UN report, it said, had highlighted areas of concerns such as use of preventive detention, defamation suits and restrictions on public protests among others.

“Singapore's claims of exemption from human rights standards are just lame excuses for abuses,” said HRW’s deputy Asia director Phil Robertson.

“The people of Singapore deserve the same rights as everyone else, not more clever stories justifying government oppression."

The group said that legislations such as the Internal Security Act (ISA) and the Criminal Law (Temporary Provisions) Act grant the government “virtually unlimited powers” to detain suspects without charge or judicial review.

Those laws, it added, have been used to imprison government critics without trial, as well as criminal suspects who should be charged under the penal code. It suggested that the government should also use the criminal code to prosecute terrorism suspects in line with international procedures.

HRW also took issue with policies which ensure the government’s tight reins over the media, which it said enable censorship, and control over films, music and computer games.

It singled out the Newspaper and Printing Presses Act, which requires publications to renew registration annually, and gives the government a “free hand” to control circulation of foreign publications.

Freedom of association is also heavily scrutinised in the country, it said, with the Registrar of Societies having the right to deny registration to associations of 10 or more members and that police permits are required for any public event involving five or more people.

"Singapore's leaders may sometimes listen to the electorate's concerns over social and economic rights, but they are apparently deaf to pleas for political space to organise and speak out without fear of prosecution,” Robertson said.

“It’s telling that Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong in his 2012 New Year’s message didn’t say a single word about civil and political rights.”

The group also called for the mandatory death sentence and judicial sentences which include caning to be banned, adding that the latter punishment amounts to torture. It added that British colonial laws on same-sex relations should be repealed due to its discriminatory nature and invasion of privacy.

Meanwhile, HRW commended the country for improving rights protections and working conditions for around 196,000 of foreign domestic workers through vigorous prosecution of employers and recruiters who physically abuse workers, fail to pay wages or subject workers to dangerous conditions.

However, it said that the government should include these workers under the Employment Act to ensure they have access to rights under the legislation.

In the review in May last year, the panel formed by the UN had recognised Singapore’s progress in improving human rights protections for women, children, migrant workers, and promoting racial and religious harmony.

Local media also reported that the panel had recommended that the country abolish the death penalty, but the government contested that its low crime rates reflect the success of capital punishment.

Singapore also dismissed the need to establish the national human rights institution – as suggested by the panel.

-- Yahoo!

Aero7 SG

Agreed 101%

mancha SG

The US want to make Singapore one of their states?

Amitayus48 SG

US talks human rights :D lol

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-16738209

The bureau has asked contractors to suggest possible solutions including the estimated cost.

Privacy campaigners say they are concerned that the move could have implications for free speech.

The FBI's Strategic Information and Operations Center (SOIC) posted its "Social Media Application" market research request onto the web on 19 January, and it was subsequently flagged up by New Scientist magazine.

The document says: "Social media has become a primary source of intelligence because it has become the premier first response to key events and the primal alert to possible developing situations."

It says the application should collect "open source" information and have the ability to:

The FBI says the information would be used to help it to predict the likely actions of "bad actors", detect instances of people deliberately misleading law enforcement officers and spot the vulnerabilities of suspect groups.

It listed websites that the centre planned to monitor. They include YouTube, the photo service Flickr, and Itstrending.com - a site which shows popular shared items on Facebook.

It also highlighted words it looked out for. These include "gangs", "small pox", "leak", "recall" and "2600" - an apparent reference to the hacking-focused magazine.

"Social networks are about connecting people with other people - if one person is the target of police monitoring, there will be a dragnet effect in which dozens, even hundreds, of innocent users also come under surveillance," said Gus Hosein, the group's executive director.

The group noted that it was seeking information from the UK's Metropolitan Police Service about its use of social networks.

sbst275 SG

human rights?

Let's give Iraq

At end of the day, is US style's of democracy...