its definitely easy for a bystander to take his cool and
objectively offers opinions...there must be one side to allow the
natural dissent and frustration of the public arising from the
incident...another for the specialists to investigate on the
truths....and of course when the aftermath settles, a film to
honour the dead and help the families...
to suppress public outcry is like suppressing on you over
someone who harms your parents deliberately and say sorry to you
sarcastically...
I understand your good intention for filming a movie. But rather
than jumping on the bandwagon like previous blockbusters has done
and make a pile out of it, and then in the name of kindness donate
some proceeds to the victims, I feel that it reeks
of hypocrisy. It's like exploiting the accident that has
happen, to garner in viewers ratings and money due to the realistic
events and something that has happened so close to home.
There are many ways to honour the dead, without making money at
the same time. When money comes into play, there are many grey
areas that would have to be resolve. Lastly, why put through the
agony that the survivors has gone through again? Especially when
the pain involved their loss of their love ones. Not very
humane.
If we want to help these people, then maybe a fund should be set
up, and governed by the government where it would given out
periodically to the families who are in need of financial help. If
the public sympathise with them, they can donate to follow
these people through the difficult times of their
life.
