After thought:
Since Dr Tambyah Siok Kuan is a professor from NUS
under marketing department. I presumed that this report was
targeted towards businesses indicator. Rather than as a political
indicator.
I think result of this nature once taken out from its
original context can be misdirected particularly in political
interpretation. I am not sure if this consumer indicator
should be used as Measuring of social content which is
relevant to reflect Singaporean perspective on government
performance. If question are phrase differently the result could be
World Apart.
What i believe could
also be counter productive; If the objective is to
inject a paradigm shift of social discontent into the street,
than the paradox could be seen even more skeptics and
cynical about the news from the practical nature of
Singaporean. Or this report could also reflected
that Singaporeans are Mentally politically "BLOCK" which
has shown no interest in "Politics" They just want to get rich and
move out.
I recalled during the US presidential elections we
have forumners in Sing who are politcal
analyst quantitatively predicted Hiliary will be the
nominated President. Guess NOW they maybe out of Job by
now.
I am not saying we enjoyed to be cynically displeasured but if
we are to do a political survey than it should stick to a political
survey. Not plug from a consumer report to a political
interpretation.
