A CDG relief driver make noise in Chinese morning
newspaper that CDG does not side ,sympath its
driver,instead only listen to 1 sifde story fr the pax!!
His complaint:
Took 2 chinese ladies on his taxis,along the way he slammed the
brake so as not to beat the red light.
Journey continued as though nothing had happened(pax did not
complained to the TD, everything was fine,they(2 ladies) kept on
chatting.
Few days later CDG called TD that pax asked for
medical compensations.& told him to prepare $1000.
Better than daylight robbery ?
What options this poor chap has ?
Ignore the demand,wait for legal letter,fight in court.
this may take yrs to go for hearing,court has more urgent &
more important cases to deliberate than this ?
Now THEN,this is a case of PATIENCE
?
This is interesting. He did not beat red light but had to brake
hard in order not to. Physical damage none! according to him. Which
could be true because if he brake so hard, both he and pax would be
hurt.
Few days later, pax claim physical damage of $1000. Driver still
okay. But Taxi Company CDG wants driver to bear this claim! What is
the insurance for then?
Can anyone explain how the taxi insurance coverage really works
in Singapore?
After reading this, I would rather beat red lights if I have
pax, because the fine is cheaper than pax medical claims.
