1. first things first: germany DID not have one million ppl; Her
population was easily at 40million. APPARENTLY you DONT know your
history well enough to argue.
2. u want to argue on his little dictatorship? fine then.
firstly, the nazi party NEVER, let me repeat that, EVER had even a
50% dominance EVER in the parliament, egt it? despite the fact the
millions turned up to cheer him like he was a king, in reality
barely 44% of the electorate ACTUALLY supported him. HE DID NOT
BECOME DICTATOR BY WINNING THE ELECTION. HE COULD NOT. he had to
kill his own ppl and threaten the chancellor to become dictator.
GET IT? have u not gotten my point or u just dont have a clue on
who hitler even was?
3. here's the thing: at rallies, millions show up cheering their
heads off, but HOW MANY actually r supporter? HOW MANY ACTUALLY
leave the rallies convinced? CAN U TELL? is that not the reason why
we trust elections better than headcounts at the rallies? BECAUSE
HEADCOUNTS ARENT EVEN ACCURATE.
4. its not logical for ur claim on many turn up for hitler
that's why he got the so-called majority vote u claim. READ UR
HISTORY. FYI: the socialists were catching up, the commies were hot
on his heels. NOT ONCEdid the nazi party ever receive 50% vote
dominance.
5.now u see the point here? so many ppl turn up to cheer and
cheer, but if it is as u say then, that 100% r supporters,
why didnt hitler become dictator straight away in1930 then, instead
of waiting four long years, and murdering his own childhood friend
then? dun give me that little millions crap, cos ur claim is
practically non-existent.
6. so many ppl turn up at the ralllies, but let me ask u this,
every year in singapore, so many ppl attend the rallies, by
opposition, but how many come and how many actually leaved
convinced r two DIFFERENT things.
7.now please, before u try to argue like a smart-aleck on hitler
with me, go read it up first, cos ur claims r so shocking and
illogical i almost laughed my teeth off:)
1) That's why you were wrong in stating that the millions that
turned up at Hitler's rally actually voted for him, he would have
obtained 90% majority. You understand where your logic went wrong?
On the other hand lots of people turned up
for the opposition rallies, but still they didn't get the majority
votes. You are wrong again! Germany's population
from 1933 to 1939 ranged from 66 million to 87 million depending on
the borders and region you want to include.
2) When you have 44% of the electorate, the rest being 15%,
20% and 21%, and so long as the other parties cannot get the
majority to form government, he has the magical 51%, he will still
have the overall say in government. Get it? You don't need 90% to
be a dictator, Benito Musolini only did it with around 60%.
3) Maybe they are all PAP supporters going to opposition
rallies. Our election process isn't even fair to begin with, with
suprise polling day, gerrymeandering, total media control. It's
easy for those who don't know how to think to be easily swayed by
what they see on the media.
4) How many times must you tell me things which I already told
you? They did not receive 50%, but you don't need above 50% to form
government if there is no opposition coalition to form an
alternative government.
5) How many times must I explain to you that the millions that
turned up does not equate to 100% or 90% the population of Germany?
I quote from your earlier post: "if the'millions' that turned up in
hitler's rallies voted for him, he would have become dictator with
a 90% dominance in parliament long ago, not needing
to wait for years with underhand tactics."
6) It's anybody's guess, I guess you know the number of folks
leaving the rallies convinced.
7) I am no smart aleck, but I am definitely smarter than you.
One again millions that turned up for Hitler's speeches does not
equate to 100% the population of Germany. One, two or three million
that turns up for the speeches do not equate to 90% of the
population. You need to get that thru that head of yours.