SM GOH RECOUNTS HOW GOVT HANDLED PAST ECONOMIC
CRISES
Sun, Feb 01, 2009
AsiaOne
Singapore has taken the unprecedented step of using a small
portion of the past reserves to tackle the recession, but this is
in no way ‘breaking the piggy bank’, said Senior Minister Goh Chok
Tong on Sunday.
In his speech at Marine Parade’s Chinese New Year celebration
lunch, SM Goh said “to break the piggy bank is to allow all the
notes and coins to spill out, with no controls over how much is
spent.”
“We are not doing that. Our reserves must continue to be
protected,” he said.
“We must continue to exercise great discipline and not dip into
our reserves at the first sign of difficulties. We should tap it
only as a last resort and when there are compelling reasons,” he
added.
SM Goh said he is in favour of putting up three “No” signs when
drawing the reserves.
“First, no use of the reserves to support social assistance
programmes. As a general principle, the Government must continue to
fund such programmes out of revenues raised in the current term of
government, not past reserves.
“Second, no draw for permanent programmes. Permanent programmes
like Workfare and ComCare, no matter how meritorious, should be
funded by current revenues and reserves.
“Third, no draw except under dire circumstances when one-off
extraordinary measures are required to ward off catastrophe or
prevent irreparable damage to the economy.”
During his speech at Roland club, SM Goh also recounted how
Singapore dealt with recessions in the past, and the lessons learnt
from it.
“The first one was in 1964, soon after we joined Malaysia. I
remember this well because I had just started work in the Economic
Planning Unit. It was a severe recession and there was high
unemployment. The older amongst you here may remember that
Singapore was banking on the common market with Malaysia to grow
our economy. That, however, did not materialise. To make matters
worse, we had to deal with domestic political turbulence, communal
tension and racial riots. Tense relations with the central
government in Kuala Lumpur, and Konfrontasi by Soekarno compounded
our problems. Singapore’s trade fell sharply, reaching the lowest
level in a decade. After we left Malaysia in 1965, our Government
decided that Singapore could not depend on the region as a
hinterland. The solution was to leapfrog the region and make the
world our market and hinterland. Against the conventional wisdom at
the time, we attracted multi-national companies to set up factories
here and we exported to the whole world. By implementing such an
export-led industrialisation strategy, we grew strongly for the
following two decades.”
“The next recession was in 1985. The seeds were sowed a few
years before, in 1979, when we instituted a high-wage policy to
compel employers to use labour more efficiently. I had just assumed
office as Minister for Trade and Industry. We decided that it made
no sense for Singapore to grow on the backs of low-skilled, lowly
paid workers. We wanted to upgrade the skills of workers and move
up the value chain so that our people could earn more. With a
favourable external climate and full domestic employment then, it
was timely to restructure our economy from labour-intensive
industries to higher value-added production. So the National Wages
Council recommended high wage increases and we upped the
CPF contribution rate to 50%. The economy
began to transform itself. The high-wage policy was meant to last
only 3 years but we could not put a brake to it as the demand for
labour remained high. Soon, our wage increases outstripped
productivity increases. Wage costs became too high and our exports
became uncompetitive. Growth fell to -1.4% in 1985.”
“Since wage costs were the main cause of the recession, we cut
the employer CPF contribution rate by 15%.
Taxes and fees were also cut to further reduce costs. But more than
cost cutting, we also invested in our future. We upgraded our
workforce through higher education and skills training. We
introduced fiscal incentives to attract higher value-added
industries. The measures worked. We arrested the recession and
growth quickly resumed.”
“After another decade of strong growth came a succession of
economic crises, beginning with the Asian Financial Crisis in 1997
and followed by the dot-com bust in 2001 and the SARS attack in 2003. The collapse of the Thai Baht in
1997 triggered steep devaluations in the Rupiah and the Korean Won
and led to a crisis of confidence in the region. The East Asian
miracle unravelled. Foreign investors and fund managers pulled out
their investments from Asia. The Singapore dollar fell by some 15%
and our stock market plunged by half. Several countries resorted to
IMF help. With IMF
intervention and tough governmental measures, confidence was
eventually restored in the affected countries. Singapore did not
need IMF or other external help because of
our strong reserves, prudent budgets and sound economy.
Nevertheless, we seized the opportunity to adjust our costs,
liberalise our financial sector and reform the economy. Within a
year, our growth resumed.”
“Then the internet bubble burst. The dot-com bust in 2000/2001
exposed our dependence on the electronics sector. This sector
contributed close to two-thirds of Singapore’s non-oil domestic
exports then. We responded by diversifying our manufacturing base
from electronics to other high value-added sectors like
petrochemicals and pharmaceuticals. We signed free trade agreements
with our major trading partners. We also promoted entrepreneurship
and promising local enterprises. We grew rapidly. Other than for
one quarter in 2003 when SARS scared the hell
out of us, our growth was uninterrupted until this year.”
- SM Goh said three lessons could be learnt from the past
crises, and he encouraged the upgrading of knowledge and skills
during this difficult period.
“First, we must remain united and resilient in the face of
crises. In past recessions, no matter how bitter the medicine,
workers and employers swallowed them and worked hand-in-hand with
the Government to tackle our common challenges. The whole
population rallied together to pull the economy out of recession.
Likewise, we must now confront our problems together, endure
short-term pain, and plan for the long term. This year’s Budget has
prescribed the right medicine but the pain will not go away
immediately. The financial sector in the US and Europe is in deep
trouble. The IMF has forecast zero growth for
the world economy this year. The International Labour Organisation
expects some 51 million jobs to be lost. Global demand for goods
and services has shrunk. We can do very little to increase demand
for our exports. But we can help companies cut costs and save jobs.
Together, we can make the “Resilience Package” work. Companies
should only retrench staff as a last resort and landlords should
pass on the property tax rebates to their tenants. Banks, both
local and foreign, should overcome their risk-aversion and continue
to lend as in normal times. Otherwise the credit crunch will choke
many sound businesses and stifle new enterprises.”
“Second, we will help you cope with the bad times. We will
extend a special helping hand to those amongst us who are most
affected by the slump, and cushion the impact on the most
vulnerable. This is not to be done by the Government alone but also
by the family and the community. Family members who are better off
should help out other members of the extended family who may need
help. Similarly, each community, like our Marine Parade community,
should reach out to the needy and those badly hit by the downturn.
But we must do this in a way that does not entrench a crutch
mentality or erode our ethos of hard work and sacrifice.
“Third, do not be demoralized by the current recession but look
beyond it. The global recession will end and we will bounce back.
So invest in our future. Upgrade our knowledge and skills and
remake ourselves to ride the upswing which will surely come. You
will notice that we are revamping our primary school education and
pouring in billions of dollars into your education and training
even though these do not directly help to solve our short-term
economic problems. This is to build up our capabilities for the
future.”
http://news.asiaone.com/News/AsiaOne+News/Singa…
You can read the
COMMENTS FROM READERS ABOUT THE ABOVE
MESSAGE
http://forums.asiaone.com/showthread.php?t=17647