hur.....i think there are 2 seperate issues here.
there is this news article and there is the Strait times.
I am not saying this news article is censored. But i am
saying because Sg has only 1 paper as such the process
of getting news printed information are managed and intended to
serve the community.
Readers read and it fudge between state message vs individual
news.
*sigh ... of course there are two separate issues here, which
was exactly my point too.
read what I wrote again .....
and I'll repackage the same questions, yet again.
since you said,
(sic)
" if the article is approved by the editor and whatever that they
go thru which representing control media than what gets
printed become a message. "
so what do you, a reader, think the "hidden state message"
was, in this case ?
Was it to insidiously consipire with the pastor to make the
sikhs look bad ?
Or was it to make the pastor look bad by printing out the pastor
own words about his father, who happened to be a sikh ?
if more people harbor similar views then perhaps I've ascribed
more intelligence to other readers of the news than I should
have.