I AGREE with Mr Jeffrey Law that readers should have faith in
our news media ('Media won't fan fever'; last Thursday). But I
disagree that news media need not comply with complete blackouts of
reporting any politically sensitive content - comments by political
heavyweights, lawsuits against candidates, announcements of policy
and rule changes, and press statements and advertisements by
government departments - during the cooling-off period. Voters
should not be bombarded with such news.
It is wrong to assume that Singaporeans are better educated, so
they can exercise good judgment to make the right decision even
when news media carries politically sensitive content favourable to
one political party on the cooling-off day. If these are the stable
conditions, why do we need the cooling-off day at all?
The real test of this new cooling-off day lies in how the ruling
party observes the rules it has set. If the 24-hour window rules
were really designed to disadvantage the opposition parties, it may
boomerang back against the ruling party and voters may swing
against it. Any abuse could cause it to cut both ways.
The test also applies to mainstream multimedia to observe the
spirit of the cooling-off window, when no local radio and
television stations, related websites and newspapers and their
online platforms should take advantage of the interpretations of
the rules to report political content. Blackout means blackout.
The cooling-off day will truly be observed as a peaceful day
where no politically sensitive content appears in any form. The
truth is that Singapore will continue to function without any
political news for one day, and voters having made up their minds
over the cooling-off day can go to the polls without
distractions.
Paul Chan