'The recent changes have not tilted the playing field
excessively in favour of citizens.'
MADAM AMILY KOK: 'I refer to last Saturday's report, 'PRs: Has
the welcome mat been rolled back?'
First, I appreciate the Government's efforts to draw more of a
distinction between permanent residents (PRs) and citizens.
I had the opportunity of living a few years in Britain. However,
as a non-Briton, I was not entitled to certain benefits. For
instance, my English friend received a weekly monetary allowance
for her child but my son was not entitled to any child benefits. I
acknowledged and accepted the fact that as a non-citizen living in
another country, I could not get the same 'red carpet' treatment as
my British friends. Instead, I focused on and was contented with
whatever benefits I did get.
PRs should be welcome but does it mean they should get the same
benefits and privileges as citizens? I wish to feel valued by my
country; therefore, a distinction should be drawn between
non-citizens and Singaporeans.
The recent changes have not tilted the playing field excessively
in favour of citizens. Many PRs acknowledge that Singapore still
offers them good prospects and a safe environment.'
