ST Forum Feb 6, 2010
<!-- by line --> <!-- end by line --> <!-- end
left side bar --> <!-- story content : start -->
I REFER to Thursday's letter by Dr Jason Wong, 'Having more
single seats will help the PAP'. I feel his reasoning is somewhat
myopic and he has made certain assumptions which may not be
accurate, stemming from observations of polling results in
Singapore in the past.
First, he mentioned that maintaining 'vulnerable' group
representation constituencies (GRCs) such as Bishan-Toa Payoh and
Tampines may be detrimental to the People's Action Party (PAP), as
opposed to converting the 10 seats in these GRCs to single member
constituencies (SMCs).
Even though in the next general election, Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC
may be led by Mr Chiam See Tong (unanimously the strongest
opposition figure based on his track record in Potong Pasir over
the past 25 years), an opposition victory is unlikely. In 1997, led
by the late Mr J.B. Jeyaretnam, the Workers' Party still lost in
Cheng San GRC. Moreover, the opposition has not come close to
winning Tampines GRC in the past 20 years, bearing in mind that the
greatest opposition threat in the east was in Eunos GRC 22 years
ago.
Second, Dr Wong seems to suggest the PAP may have a better
chance of winning SMCs when this may not be the case as younger and
less experienced PAP candidates may be pitted against opposition
heavyweights who have worked the ground over the years. If the
number of SMCs is expanded, these less experienced PAP candidates
may no longer have the 'shield' of contesting a GRC led by a PAP
heavyweight.
However, I agree with Dr Wong's suggestion to increase the
number of SMCs as this will aid the ruling party in quashing
criticism that many PAP newcomers become ministers without a proper
'fight'. More important, it will also address the age-old criticism
of the GRC system being just an excuse to win more seats by the
winning party, as a multiracial nation like Malaysia does not
resort to GRCs to ensure that minority MPs are represented in
Parliament.
Robin Chee