jacky i tink u can save ur breath.... BIC is a believer and you
are not... the way you both see things are gonna be too far
apart.
That's an excellent observation you just made!
It all boils down to a question of worldview, which everyone
has, a set of belief system with which we view the world and make
sense of things. Do you now finally get the whole point I have been
trying to make all this while?
The atheist's worldview is closely tied to naturalism. This
worldview colors everything he sees. No supernatural explanation or
causation is allowed into his way of explaining any phenomenon he
encounters. It can and must only be explained by or away in
naturalistic ways. If there's no naturalistic explanation now, one
will come up later eventually, by faith it will come. Even if it is
ridiculous the naturalistic explanation must be maintained.
The theist's worldview is not restricted to our five
senses. Effects can have both natural or supernatural causes.
Theism recognises that natural causes are incapable of doing
certain things, and that certain effects are best explained by
intelligence, even a supernatural one.
It all boils down to which worldview is the best worldview to
view the world with. And when you do take the time to seriously and
critically compare the ability of the two worldviews of atheism and
theism to explain and account for the questions of utmost
significance you will realise that theism wins handsdown.
