ok if ull think im biased then we look at a open
perspective...
1. Shes rich
2. Shes not refusing that shes rich
3. She admits that she has the expensive phone, or the expensive
makeup bullshit.
4. she say that shes misquoted, that means that the news in the
article are partially true.
5. she does not deny about the secondary sch pocket money or the
LV bag.
Thus, with this, people, i leave it to you'll to decide whether
she is a spoilt rich kid. As much i hate to say it, although she
lacks discipline and self control, and is immatured, her parents
are the ones to be blamed. But nothing much can be said, shes also
part of the elitist scum.
1. Being rich is a crime?
2. Admitting that she's rich is a crime?
3. Having an expensive phone is a crime?
4. Misquotes can be a very bad thing. Leaving little bits out
and inventing other bits can change the story altogether. Even
simple summarization of facts can be a bad thing if it changes the
context altogether - as what happened here.
Don't believe me? Instead of saying 'You smell nice
today, darling' to your girlfriend, just try saying
'You smell' to her. Sentence summarization
mah.....
5. So she has money. And she dreams of buying an LV bag.
So? She did say that she only dreams of it. I dream of buying a
Lamborghini. Am I an elitist scum?
At the end of the day...... what the heck is your beef with
her?
