who to blame? he lah... y put
her name leh?
condo cannot be joint
meh?
honeymoon time nv think of this..
now break up le then wana sue her.. funny lor..
when love is gone, money
talks?
she is the one who has more money
her biggest 'game money' was $500,000
his biggest 'game money' was only one fifth of
hers
so my guess is the ownership is not 50-50 (especially the
house)
so maybe that's why the china woman no put his name?
and he said that all along he thot they will be married one day so
he never 计较
he is the chin chai party in the relationship
and the more patient one
being the youngest of 4 siblings
she is the 天之骄女, and hot-tempered one, being the only child at
home
but law says if can prove that he has paid money in those
purchases as shown by bank transactions or giro or instalments or
whatever
he can claim back his money even though the assets are not under
his name
then she/her lawyer can counter by saying that those are gifts
i think he is really chin chai and naive
he said he may take legal action to get back his contribution
but not those gifts that he has given her
he said they both used to give generous gifts to each other
i also agree house and car are shared-use items and with big
price-tags
if not going to get married
and being the poorer one
why can't he get his money back?
and i think the newspaper report is siding
him
