Is human cloning actually old science found in bible

last SG · 2008-03-12T10:15:33+00:00

I think what he’s trying to say if digging up n using technology that contributed to the demise of the Earth so long ago is indeed a wise decision.Probably c...

Catknight SG

Vatican recently listed human cloning as a mortal sin and set the motion thinking are we repeating an old technology given to us by our creator eons ago that form our gene pool of modern human being today.

Anyone here with biotech background care to tell us more, if cloning is an old technology. are we repeating the mistake of our ancestors in ancient middle east?

Matthew Omaye Ajiake, author of Nephilim: The First Human Clones. Ajiake makes a case for the existence of human clones in Old Testament times in the form of the Nephilim, descendants of Cain, one of the sons of Adam. The Nephilim were referred to as giants” and the fallen ones” – unnatural and grotesque creatures.

the Bear SG

what are you trying to say?

Catknight SG

I’m just putting a case of a technology as dangerous as nuking us off thsi planet…creating halfman half gorilla ..the next Ah meng can talk to me and clear our HDB rubbish chutes that even blangedesh workers found too dirty

Catknight SG

If you look at the illustrations found in the walls of eygpt , you find snakes shaped like our DNA structure…uncanny resemblance then a baby is taken out from there..what does it say?

Maith SG

have u taken ur medicine?

Catknight SG

Oh no serious researcher in paranormal ancient history sorry

Melbournite SG

Vast amounts of knowledge and Scinece exised in the ancient world.

In fact the the device which destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki was invented by the inspiration of the Baghavad Gita, a Hindu Manuscript as admitted by its inventor

Catknight SG

Secret agenda if US war in Iraq: Baghdad…......is Babylon
The Original Garden of Eden
The Cradle of Humanity!I believe that there are many secret ET techology hidden there in Iraq more valuable than oil and the ones who discovered this alien techonolgy will unlock and control our destiny

Catknight SG

The first, and oldest, belief is that “the sons of God” were fallen angels who consorted with human women, producing giant offspring called nephilim. This view was widely held in the Judaic world of the first century, and was supported by many of the “Ante-Nicene Fathers,” including Justin Martyr, Clement of Alexandria, Tertullian, Irenaeus, and Eusebius.

The second view is one which was advocated by Saint Augustine, the Catholic Bishop of Hippo. He rejected the concept of the fallen host having committed fornication with women. In his early fifth century book The City of God, he advanced the theory that “the sons of God” simply referred to the genealogical line of Seth, who were committed to preserving the true worship of God. He interpreted Genesis 6 to mean that the offspring of Adam through Seth were “the sons of God,” and the offspring of Adam through Cain were “the daughters of men.” He wrote that the problem was that the family of Seth had interbred with the family of Cain, intermingling the bloodlines and corrupting the pure religion. This view has become the dominant one among most modern biblical scholars.

The third view is that “the sons of God” were the sons of pre-Flood rulers or magistrates. This interpretation was advocated by two of the most respected Jewish rabbis of the Middle Ages, Rashi and Nachmanides, and became the standard explanation of rabbinical Judaism. However, it is not widely accepted by modern scholars.

BeautifulBetty SG

Eve is the clone of Adam oso. Taken from his rib. That means God biggest sinner since he invented cloning

dumbdumb! SG

lets just wait till we die lor. that's the surest way

elementalangel SG

Eve is the clone of Adam oso. Taken from his rib. That means God biggest sinner since he invented cloning

the bible is full of contradictions....

still its written by the same people who said the world was flat

Chewbacca987 SG

...what?

I'm not following most of you people's argument.

IIRC, according to most christians against cloning/genetic/biological enginering :

God created men, created other beings, refined them and what not. God is the one that did the cloning/g/b engineering. As such, only God should be allowed to do this.

For human to do the same task as God will infringing on the realm of God. We are attempting to make ourselves equal, or better than God.

So, the Christians ARE arguinging that cloning is an old technology (if you're calling it technology, perhaps it's magic, in Christian view?) but it is God's sole right.

Anyway, I'm very much FOR g/b engineering. I believe that it is truly the only way for human to progress.

Imagine this : If scientists discovers how to genetically engineer a being to be smarter than themselves (even if it's just marginally) then this new....human, will grow up and discover a better way of genetically engineering the next subject to be even smarter. This is known as technological singularity (further reading : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technological_singularity)

So, in the end, you will have a being that is, by all means, omniscient. If this being decides to judge us Old Humans, well, then most religions' idea of apocalypese will come true, isn't it? A being that is as powerful as God will look at us and, based on how we have done, judge us and decide if we will live or die.

Kelthuzad SG

Eve is the clone of Adam oso. Taken from his rib. That means God biggest sinner since he invented cloning

God's greatest sin is to create idiots that like to post "God" and "Bible" threads in non-religious forums such as Chit-Chat.... KNN, want to let my hair down and surf Chit-chat keep running into idiotic topics like this one

gigabyte14 SG

catknight is andrewpkyap?

Daisuke-kun SG

no wonder

Chewbacca987 SG

Ah, come on lar, take the stick out of your ass. It makes for good and interesting discussion, does it not? It's better than bloody 'lol wut type of bag r u lol' type of topics. It's nice to think, imagine about non-trivial everyday matters once in a while.

Catknight SG

hi guys, Bible research is getting more interesting as we are finding our ancestors are more advanced than we think they are…It’s like they are telling us oh gosh we’ve done that and paid a very dear price for it and you guys are repeating this, don’t men ever learn?

Kelthuzad SG

That is what you believe. You belief that the Bible is a record of true events. I believe that it is pure fabrication and not worthy of any "research". What I do not understand is your contitutional inability to post this type of topics in a forum (like EH) where people who share your belief can indulge you in "researching" the Bible together with you.

It is a win-win situation. You will get what you want; research into the Bible, rather than to have people belittling you.

BeautifulBetty SG

...what?

I'm not following most of you people's argument.

IIRC, according to most christians against cloning/genetic/biological enginering :

God created men, created other beings, refined them and what not. God is the one that did the cloning/g/b engineering. As such, only God should be allowed to do this.

For human to do the same task as God will infringing on the realm of God. We are attempting to make ourselves equal, or better than God.

So, the Christians ARE arguinging that cloning is an old technology (if you're calling it technology, perhaps it's magic, in Christian view?) but it is God's sole right.

Anyway, I'm very much FOR g/b engineering. I believe that it is truly the only way for human to progress.

Eh? You sure it's call magic? Christians don't term it as magic. Magic to them or rather to some overly C... is evil, dark art and weaved only by the devil. So God don't use magic. It's call M I R A C L E or work of nature by God's hand.