Received this interesting read from
email....
THE 5 LOGICS
SYSTEMS:
Emotional
Logic
This Logic works entirely on
emotions and has the tendency and power to overwrite the other
Logics below. Examples of Emotional Logic: Love, Greed,
Lust...etc.
Knowledge
Logic:
This Logic works entirely on
existing information/knowledge of a particular subject. Examples:
doctor who gave medical advice, lawyers who gave legal
advice…etc.
Logical Logic (Common
Sense):
This Logic needs no
explanation.
System
Logic:
This Logic is defined as the logic
which is entirely made up of/constitutes of “laws” or “rules”. The
person who sets the “laws” is entirely responsible for any
misfortunes/misgivings/mishaps that arise from abiding of the
“laws”. Examples of places which this logic applies; legal courts,
sports events, competition events, lottery draws…etc.
Warp
Logic:
This Logic is defined as
“when nature of the action (partial or entire) is
not in line or contradicts with intention”. Example: you gave a
gift of wine to your enemy at the office and unknown to your enemy,
the wine is laced with laxative by you. Gift-giving is to bring
goodwill but your intention is to cause hurt to your
enemy.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commentary on the Logics: Arrange all the 5 Logics
in alphabetical order and the Logic on top is the most powerful
which is Emotional Logic. Therefore, Warp Logic is the lowest and
weakest form of Logic. Logical Logic can easily defeat System Logic
as in times, people have known to mend laws/rules to their own
advantage by using loopholes in the “laws”. Knowledge Logic is
quite similar to System Logic, except that “rules” in Knowledge
Logic is derived from facts whereas “rules” in System Logic is
entirely based on fairness.
Application of the
Logics:
Instead of writing “Strictly wait
for me to return then do this”, you can write “Wait for me to
return then do this. SYS LOG” but you will undertake all
responsibilities of the person who obeyed your “rule”. This also
means that the person will wait for you until you return but if you
fail to return, the person would be waiting for you
eternally...
Hence, you should include a
time-frame, “Wait for me to return then do this. If I do not return
after 15 Feb, then do plan B. SYS LOG” or you can put it as Logical
Logic, “Wait for me to return then do this. LOG LOG”. Logical Logic
allows the person to make interventions or his own actions in view
of the situation.