Dear folks,
In view of the recent media spotlight on Sggirls.com, i cannot help
but ponder whether if we have lost our founder's intentions when he
1st established this website.
I believe our founder (this 24 year Singaporean chap) wanted this
site to be a pure website featuring pretty , unique and charming
Singapore girls in decent poses so that we can appreciate and
praise the girl's beauty.
But somewhere along the line, this simple and pure vision of
appreciating beauty is lost when we see people posting all sorts of
sexually suggestive pictures of women in their candid positions. So
we are no longer appreciators of Sg girls beauty but Peeping Toms
of Singapore.
I must say that our moderators are trying very hard to weed out
pornographic pictures and pictures with illicit content. But, i
believe the moderators are short-staffed and sometimes, a few
obscene pics get pass our moderators.
I think the crux of the problem is that (i)Sggirls.com features
sexually candid pictures of women and (ii) Sggirls.com allow
immoral pics (though not pornography pics) such as the intimate
school girls pictures to be posted.
Some forum mates may feel that websites such as Sammyboy.com are
worser and sggirl is the lesser evil. But the contentious issue is
that sggirls.com is featuring innocent women( under (i) and (ii) )
whereas cheap sluts and prostitutes are featured in
sammyboy.com.
These innocent women can be your beloved girlfriends, wifes, or
sisters. We may enjoy the cheap thrill now in ogling at such
pictures of category (i) and (ii) but BAd Karma will return one day
when u realize the woman in the picture is someone you know and
love.
May i suggest that we increase the number of moderators and the
moderators work in shifts 24/7 to ensure the site is secured from
pictures of type (i) and (ii). And also, Can we eliminate the
category of "Candid", "lingerine" and "sexually(Not suitable for
Children)" pictures?
Hmm, i would really like to hear from our founder (this 24 year old
Singaporean) and our moderators on my opinion.
Thanks.