What will you do with this technology?

last SG · 2007-10-10T17:06:54+00:00

So you are unable to defend your "technology", am i right? Do you even know half of what you are talking about? Or are you just blabbering what you remember...

hisoka SG

obviously set up your own business unit and convince the govenments to allow you to set up the plants etc to replace the current feuls. of course you must find a way to make sure its not pirated. you would be saving earth AND making money for yourself at the same time. Or if you find it abit too duanting, you can offer to sell the technology to some company/merger.

the problem is i doubt what you said is possible without some drawbacks or perhaps other materials since what you described seems to violate energy conservation laws.
Somethign along the lines of perpetual motion machines.

Darkness_hacker99 SG

Usuable energy will be only 1 unit net, because you need the another unit of energy to create two more energy.

The energy you're talk is on what magnitude? Megawatt? Gigawatt?

I believe more research have to be done.

Herzog_Zwei SG

If you read up wikipedia about electrical component resonance, you will get his meaning. EEE guys tend to use the effect to reduce overall power lost. However in reality, it is not feasible to build such perpentual energy machine.( energy lost through wastage in LRC components)

hisoka SG

you can make much more money sellign the thing so that you don't even need to worry about those things

NewAgeSensitiveBoy SG

What we have is not theory only but a working prototype. A little intro about the theory behind the discovery:

At present, in order to charge up a rechargeable battery, energy is needed to force free electrons into the negative terminal, alter the equilibrium of the battery and cause the positive terminal to expel free electrons. The new device deploys the same principle, but it further employs the principle as stated above during the charging process, i.e. deliberately causing breaks in the circuit to create a series of fractured current in order to introduce several timed electrons shockwave instantaneously across the circuit during the breaks.

By deliberately creating a series of current breaks throughout the charging process, the fractured form of current is being use to charge the rechargeable battery B while also serves as a triggering energy to produce an electrons shockwave that creates a situation whereby the potential energy of the individual electron within the positive terminal is used to repel each other out of the positive terminal and spreading across the vacuum zone without injecting any extra energy.

sLeEpWaLkErInG SG

u can pm me on the last question which i ask, as i can get some1 to check out whether he want to finance this, but he is currently not in Singapore, only will be back next week.

Herzog_Zwei SG

Has anyone considered waste heat from internal resistance? Did your engineers do any Bode plot on RLC circuits with the secondary power source? Has your system been calibrated for the expected wastage?(i.e increasing the effiency of system to minimise wastage) Kindly run that prototype of yours for 48 hours straight and check for spikes in the S-transform of components.

NewAgeSensitiveBoy SG

I think the scale itself is beyond our teams financial capabilities and i tink at that scale of 300MW plant, it would be quite difficult to replicate.

I would also like to market to our local govt, but imagine just posting here draws so many questions, the agencies would probably think i am crazy. Our position now is almost like the wright brothers in the good old days convincing ppl that human being can take the sky.

And again, what we have discovered is not witch craft science tat violates the laws of physics nor require any special element that will deplete to function. We have merely discovered a waterfall within the electric circuit where a dam can be built upon. As long as electricity runs through the circuit as configured, the "dam" can function and generate the power to create further electricity.

pwnz0r SG

something similar has been done in India.

getting it out of the lab and being commercially viable is another story.

becareful. the oil producing countries might put a contract on your head. the cost of getting you killed is nothing to the billions that they earn.

hisoka SG

Make a small local company first or elsewhere. start small and later you can expand or merge

If you got a workign product then you can market it. To the govt. or to another company, joint ventures?
It will draw questions definitely. You will have to be prepared to field those questions. But if you really do have a working prototype then it would probably be easier.

You did patent the product everywhere didn't you?

NewAgeSensitiveBoy SG

A full discharge test has been conducted and all of the above has been done, all satisfying beyond reasonable doubts. Wink

NewAgeSensitiveBoy SG

That I am aware. The question about upscaling commercially has been considered while designing the device and it has been designed in a way where it can be practically applied.

The consideration of marketing this technology is always the case of obsoleting other industries and professions ie. oil, so yes, we are taking the consipracy as you have mentioned very seriously which is why the device has been dismantled and parts held by various parties jus to calm our paranoid psychology Wink

MyPillowTalks SG

if i were u, i will make it into handphone so one battery can charge up the other battery in the phone, so no need scared low battery

NewAgeSensitiveBoy SG

I think the question now is who do we market this to and how? and no we did not patent is as patent itself would require us to reveal the technology is full perspective. So like Coke, we are keeping the secret formula under our pillows.... Wink

sLeEpWaLkErInG SG

there is always reverse engineering that the smart ass can do. Wink

hisoka SG

go for the govt. if you want. the problem is they might throw it to china and we all know whats it like there.

keeping it as a trade secret might not be the best choice given reverse engineering and espionage.

patenting, you can leave it very vague too if i'm not wrong. but its really up to you.

you might conisder throwing this to some of the petrol companies too.

Clandestine SG

The minute you pressed "post"...the government has begun tracking you.

Your secret is no longer safe....and your idea no longer yours.

Question: Can we patent "intellectual property" such as a theory? Shocked

NewAgeSensitiveBoy SG

We are still trying to identify who we should approach at the moment before we go about thinking of the approach. But as a Singaporean, I’d think that the country ranks abv all but of cos provided it be implemented.

NewAgeSensitiveBoy SG

serious bo? Shocked i wasn't aware of that and i tot enemy of the state was fiction....

as to your question, i dun tink so. but then, i haven't check so i may be wrong

Where Is God SG

Sorry, but energy cannot be created or destroyed.

You cannot create free energy, and neither does free energy exist.

These are fundamental laws of physics, and certainly, there is no way to charge 2 batteries with 1, for that would violate the very basics of of the laws of conservation of energy. The only way that is almost achievable is to use one battery to partially charge 2 other identical battery, but that is only ideally, for in real life, there is the element of inherent inefficiency present.

Simply to put it, the "extra" energy must be coming from somewhere and since you mentioned nothing about nuclear fission/fusion, or any chemical reaction, i would assume that you are claiming these "extra" energies are pulled from thin air. This is not possible, for if you claim so, you are inadvertently claiming that you can create matter out of nothing, according to Einstein's E=mc^2 law.

You are making a very huge claim here. Being able to create matter out of nothing, and i wouldn't be surprised if it gets thrown out the patent office, for this is too absurd and you'll be possibly the greatest scientist and inventor ever if it were true. In fact, you'd be the first person in the world to create matter out of thin air.

But alas, i remain a skeptic.

Besides, are your researches even peer-reviewed? For that would surely be a good gauge of truthfulness and honesty.

All in all, I would say that you are most likely trying to amass investment from clueless investors. Scamming, in other words.

« Previous Page Next Page »