comparision between integra type-R and mitsubishi gto

last SG · 2006-06-16T23:25:00+00:00

wa lao...if i got the money i will get this http://www.sgcarmart.com/main/info-2wNny-1027.html

ölala SG

ok,so if its a coupe,the specs realyl dosent show its a performance car, technically
0-100 in 9.8 is slow

[email protected] SG

btw n00b, your specs for the SS1 is WRONG. get over your stupid ego and accept the truth

[email protected] SG

stop throwing specs that i've already told u are wrong. Get over your immature die die want face ego.

ölala SG

i aint wrong,will get pic psoted after i retrive my pw for server
meanwhile get ur specs posted
dun give me mod,i wan stock

lastly dun attept to force ur intentions or views on others juz bcuz u dun like wat others do
i see ur been pin pointing me in recent car topics
u can get a kia for all who cares
u can get a hyudai getz for all who cares

ppl wanna a gto/eg6...who r u to care?
and assume if car is parents paid,so wat?u dun like it,so be it...liek i said dun force urself on others

rmb the sepc
walk the talk

[email protected] SG

u want stock? stock coming RIGHT UP. yea u walk the talk yea?

u get ready to swallow humble pie and apologise.

Laughing

tofushop193 SG

i think olala need this
http://www.smartmotorist.com/typ/typ.htm

[email protected] SG

from http://www.celicas.co.uk/Specs.htm

[email protected] SG

From topgear magazine

also have a look at whether they call it a sedan or a COUPE

ölala SG

The fkin server got prob,but rest assured i'll have the specs up

my specs for celica for the speed r diff
its 0-100 in 8.9
however urs is 0-60 in 8.9

but i was saying wif these sepcs,its TECHINICALLY not a sports car
outside yes,mechanics no!

[email protected] SG

From TOYOTA themselves:

142ps is aprox 140bhp

AE86tofu SG

get this right...sedan has FOUR DOORS...celica has two....if thats the case the BMW M3 is a SEDAN???

AE86tofu SG

8.7 secs is SLOW…..140BHP? pah…what a disgrace to the old celica

[email protected] SG

boy, LEARN and stop digging yourself a own hole.

1stly, its 8.7 not 8.9, and its certainly not 9.8 like u claimed.

2ndly, 0-100km/h is also 0-60mph. If u're not well versed in automotive lingo and switching betweening imperial and metric, don't even think about coming here to argue.

I've provided 3 different sources, INCLUDING TOYOTA. What source are u trying to quote? Please. Be a man, admit yr mistake and apologise while u still can. 17 yr old already cannot swallow your ego n pride. Rolling Eyes

With these specs technically not a sportscar? u can drive then come n say again ok? U don't even know how 0-100 in 8.7 in the DRIVER'S SEAT feels like, pls don't come here and talk big.

AE86tofu SG

so u're telling me that u're just a poseur la....go for looks....then u go buy a kia rio and put GT wing,"brembo" and "rear disc conversion" Laughing
either that go get yrself a TS and desperately try to make it look like a wrx

AE86tofu SG

dude u sure the engine can rev till 61k rpm?? Laughing

[email protected] SG

compared to the old celica la. the old celica had 300 bhp but it was heavier. Rolling Eyes

8.7s is certainly NOT slow.

tofushop193 SG

then wat kind of timing u call a fast car???
0-100km/h in 3 secs???

ölala SG

wat talking u?
i tink u mixed up ur words
ok,i admit celica is a coupe however,its specs isnt that of a true sports car,the accerleration is bad

and sorry pal,i dun liek celicas,so wats the asociation wif a poser?
i was telling heng tat i wuld ratehr go for performances car than a sedan then[i tho a celica was a sedan]
even now i've heard celica aint no sedan,i still wuld b goign for it cuz of its specs
so i guess ur usage of posur aint appropiate here

[email protected] SG

ignore the 190. we're concentrating on the 1.8 here Laughing

ölala SG

the bench mark
0-100 shld b in 3 or lesser than 6
no true sports car go 0-100 at 9 and above

« Previous Page Next Page »