To explore your point even further,
what you're saying is if there is a dire need for some helpful
action to be taken, it shouldn't be done as long as there is a risk
involved. And that is ridiculous. Speeding is absolutely different
from driving recklessly. I won't rule it out that it might have
been a possibility that the driver could have been
reckless
Even if hes love one were in their final hrs,so
what?
I believe if he really cared for them,even if he culdnt make it on
time,they wuld have know that he was a caring person from what he
has done to them in his daily life..
Theres no reason to use selfishness to justify ur act
and suppsoe the person had knock down into a pedestrain of other
motorist,whos gonan make up for the victim cause?
Just because you have such a way of
thinking doesn't mean the rest of the world ought to follow your
self-taught ah lian philosophy. There is no substantial reason for
you to justify your selfish kind of logic. Do you honestly think
that most people out there would cruise along the roads normally if
their one of their family or friends were in the hospital, in
danger of losing their lives? Would you? I'd like to see you
try.
THINK AGAIN!
U still got alot to grow in terms of ur mind!
Use your head again please.
Emergencies aren't called emergencies for nothing. That's why
ambulances and firetrucks have to drive faster to get to an urgent
situation earlier. Time is of the essence. If you drive slowly,
keep to the left then. Not everyone drives like you, don't be
selfish.
