is this true? does smart and talented guys appeal to gals?

mystee SG

yes, i prefer guys who are capable.. smart..

definately not those who are not smart.. who try & act smart

Ristar SG

u can say this now, mystee. however, in the end, it is how good that guy makes u FEEL that u base your decision on.

mystee SG

Originally posted by Ristar:

u can say this now, mystee. however, in the end, it is how good that guy makes u [b]FEEL that u base your decision on.[/b]

true.. thats y i said, i prefer.. but seriously smart alex is a big no for me.

Ristar SG

and gals do not choose wat they prefer because of how they are programmed. Wink

gals want a lot of excitement and prefer to be with somebody exciting (who may get only average results), handsome, muscular and is confident (Alpha Male trait) to a bloody fugly nerd (bad dressing, inconfidence, inept in social situations).

thats why, it is also technically wrong to say that u prefer capable and smart guys, since smart alex would definitely fall into this category.

sorry, im not flaming u... i cant sleep. thats all. Laughing

mystee SG

for the red part.. is not true for all gals.

yes for confident but it doesnt apply to men only. women do need to have confident of themselves. but same thing apply, over confident is also a turn off.

for me, i am looking for a long term r/s, thus, i go for husband traits. I prefer guys to be homely, stable, committed, capable. definately not smart alex & playful type.

mistyblue SG

mystee SG

nah.. i dont consider that as flaming.. no worries ya..

Ristar SG

mystee

really? ASL?! lets meet up for coffee. Laughing

as always, defensiveness abt it not being true for all gals. i will leave u be then, because it is pointless for me to say/explain anything more.

husband. but in modern society as another forumite has put it so eloquently, anything is possible.

i will leave u with this thought... a psychology book i read some time ago says that any form of excitement with a guy can be misconstrued as love, including fear.

mistyblue

in another point of view (mine)

the gals HAVE to be with a guy (geek) in the game.

how many of these hot gals would have spared the worst looking nerds in the show a second glance if they werent in the game? Laughing

if u would, ASL?!

mystee SG

Originally posted by Ristar:
[b]mystee

really? ASL?! lets meet up for coffee. Laughing

as always, defensiveness. i will leave u be then, because it is pointless for me to say anything more.

husband. but in modern society as another forumite has put it so eloquently, anything is possible.

mistyblue

in another point of view (mine)

the gals HAVE to be with a guy (geek) in the game.

how many of these hot gals would have spared the worst looking nerds in the show a second glance if they werent in the game? Laughing

if u would, ASL?! [/b]

hmm.. i m not trying to be defensive.. that is the truth.. maybe you are still young to know of women who thinks the same as i do.

fyi, i m much older than u.. if u are born in 1985, & i m attached with a stable, "not exciting" bf for 5 yr +...

& lastly.. y do u tink of guys who are capable as a nerd? not all are.. & what wrong with nerds? i tink they are much better than flirts.

Ristar SG

find out more by reading up yourself.. im not abt to give "lessons" in an online forum. and im far from being qualified to do that anyway.

wat i'd like to say abt it is that "nerds" expose gals (who needs to be excited to some degree) to a wider range of emotions.

could i be so bold as to say that age has tampered with your thinking?

young gals wanna have fun, which by now everyone knows wat that really means, than settle down.

mystee SG

since u feel that u understand women so much.. & feel that u are correct.. no point for me to further comment.

all i can say is: "to be a woman, to understand a woman" "not all human are built with the same preference"

Ristar SG

lol.

different preferences, yes.

same programming, yes.

in the end, still the feeling that counts. Laughing
btw u confirmed this lil fact already. thx.

if my understanding on the fairer sex is lacking however, please forgive me. better men have died before they understood women.

it is also said that it is futile to argue with a gal on a logical level too.
no offense intended to anyone, of course.

bo liao SG

From your post, its true to a certain degree....

If those guai gals study type, can learn something from that particular guy.Its possible for tat guy top be more appling then normal guys that dun hv much to share..

Its also depends on what age group u are talking about.

EDITED: For now, i only see rich guys become more appealing...

Of cos got some poor guys they is knn lucky that have a good & understanding gf tat stick wid them.

xShevchenkox SG

hope l can get such good & understanding gfs lor...but if dun hab oso nvm lar...single lor... Very Happy

« Previous Page