lancer 1.6AT engine sohc...as always mit engine roars like a
lion on high rpm. FC would not be that good. I using MT 1L=13km
(average). AT is around 9-10km. 0-100 wound not be really that
fast.. It took me 9secs+drag on the MT... AT i estimated 12-13sec.
For the price its going now, it would be a good ideal to get a
lancer. Lance are more for appearance wise if you know how to do it
up. Interior is reasonable. If you are thinking about FC, it would
be best to get a MT as you will be in better control of it.
With some add-ins of parts or accesorries, it would have better
performance.
I using MT stock car, Gear1 = 0-40 gear2 = 40-90 gear3 = till 130.
You will be able to achieve the above results if you drag till 7K
rpm. I have seen 1 lance who change open pod
filther+muff+stabiliser drag 0-100 in around 8secs. If you are
looking for a normal sedan, it would be alright. But I personally
find that the CS3 lance butt is a bit heavy. If you cornering at
high speed, you can really feel the butt pushing out alot which
causes the rear to skid. Overall ratings for it I would give a 7.5
out of 10
