By Daniel Denvir
If you thought you
knew all there was to know about the Vietnam War, you were wrong.
For example: ever heard of the "Mere Gook Rule," a code of conduct
the US military came up with in order to make it easier for
soldiers to murder Vietnamese civilians without feeling too bad
about it? ("It's only a mere gook you're killing!")
Well, few
people knew about this bit of history either until author Nick
Turse discovered it in secret US military archives, which he used
as the primary sources for his new(ish) book, Kill
Everything That Moves: The Real American War in
Vietnam. The book is based on Turse's discovery of
theretofore secret internal military investigations of
US-perpetrated atrocities alongside extensive reporting in Vietnam
and among American veterans, and it reminds us that the most
significant fact about the Vietnam War is its most overlooked:
massive and devastating Vietnamese civilian suffering.
The
debate over the US's war in Vietnam continues to hang over this
country's most recent and techno-futuristic imperial adventures.
Nick's book makes for timely if extraordinarily painful reading,
and I sat down with him recently to talk about the ongoing
relevance of Vietnam, massacres, and secretly photocopying whole US
government archives.
Within an
hour I was going through this box, many boxes actually, these
reports of massacres, murders, rape, torture, assault, mutilation.
Records put together by this Vietnam War Crimes Working Group
impaneled in the Army Chief of Staff's office in the wake of the My
Lai massacre, to track any war crimes cases or allegations that
bubbled up from the field, to make sure that the Army wasn't caught
flat footed again. And whenever it could it tried to tamp down
these allegations.
So this
group put together this massive collection of files. And after I
found it I wrote my dissertation on these documents, and after I
defended my dissertation I went to Vietnam.
What I
was told in the countryside was beyond my ability to grasp,
something that I could have never have gotten from the records. And
I would talk to Vietnamese who would tell me about what it was like
just to try and eke out an existence in the war zone. About having
their home burned down five, six seven times. And then finally
giving up rebuilding and starting to live a semi-subterranean life
in their bomb shelter. About how they figured out ways to get out
of that shelter, to get water or food or relieve themselves. And
how their entire lives were just predicated on figuring out a way
not to get killed. They would talk about artillery called down on a
hamlet, and they would run into the bomb shelter. And stay there.
And then this whole calculus would begin where they would try and
figure out exactly when the right time to leave that shelter was.
You had to wait until the artillery shelling stopped, but you
couldn't leave too soon or you were apt to be cut down by a
helicopter gunship that was flying overhead. You had to make sure
you weren't caught in a crossfire between departing guerrillas and
the onrushing Americans. But you couldn't stay down there too long
because the Americans were coming, and they would start rolling
grenades into the bomb shelters because they saw them as possible
enemy bunkers, fighting positions. There all of these decisions to
be made, and it wasn't just your life that depended on making it,
but maybe your entire family. The whole family could get wiped out
if you left a second too early or a second too late.
I was
just a grad student at the time, I didn't have the money for this
endeavor. I said to him, "I'm going to have to put together a grant
proposal and it would be months before I got down there." And he
just pulled out his checkbook and wrote me a check on the spot and
said, "Go down there and get these documents."
Within 24
hours I was down at the Archives. I went in first thing in the
morning and I copied until they threw me out at night. I put every
cent that he gave me into copying. I slept in my car in the
Archives parking lot and I collected this entire collection.
I always
thought he was a little paranoid. I didn't think there was a real
need to get all the documents. It turned out that it was a smart
move because these documents, sometime after I first published from
the files, they were pulled from the Archives' shelves and they
haven't been publicly available in the same way since. Now you have
to file a Freedom of Information Act request.
But he
quieted down and said he wanted to tell me a story about a member
of his unit. And he talked about how they were going through a
village and burning it down, which was standard operating
procedure. And in the midst of this, this woman runs up and grabs
this GI by the sleeve, and is tugging at him and yelling at
him—obviously because her home is being burned down, all her
possessions are going up in flames. And she's angry, scared, upset.
And he said this GI just pushed her off, and then took his rifle
and hit her squarely in the nose with the butt. And he said her
face just erupted in blood. She was screaming. And the GI just
turned around and walked away laughing. And he paused a second and
said, "Do you know that GI was me?" He had such a tough time
figuring out how he could have done it. All these years later. At
the time he didn't think anything of it, and in the years since, he
couldn't help but think of it on a constant basis. And it really
haunted him. And I had the same problem trying to match up the man
that I was talking to with his 19-year old self.
He told
me about how the training that he went through dehumanized the
Vietnamese to the point where they didn't think of them as human.
They thought of them as—they had a whole bunch of slurs that were
used: dinks, slopes, slants, gooks. And he talked about how "I
didn't become exactly like a robot but it was like that." You're
trained to kill, you chant "Kill, kill kill." It psychologically
readies you for this.
They were
told by their superiors that all Vietnamese were likely the enemy.
That children might carry grenades, women were probably the wives
or girlfriends of guerillas, and they were probably making booby
traps.
And even
if there were rules of engagement on paper, or little cards handed
out saying to treat the Vietnamese properly, the message that they
were really given was that it was a lot safer to shoot first
because no one was going to ask questions later.
They were
searching for some metric, some measure to show that they were
winning a war. They settled on the attrition strategy which was
used during the second half of the Korean War, and the main measure
was body count. You would kill your way to victory by piling up
Vietnamese bodies, and the Americans were always chasing this
crossover point when they would be killing more Vietnamese
guerrillas than the enemy could put into the field. And the idea
was that at that moment, the enemy would give up the
fight.
Because
they would view the war as a rational effort the way the Pentagon
did: this was a ledger sheet. And once the debits outweighed the
credits, then they would end the war. They didn't think the way the
Vietnamese did, that this was a revolutionary struggle. The
Vietnamese saw it as a continuation of their anti-colonial fight
against the French.
The
troops in the field, they were pressed for bodies. Their commanders
were leaning on them heavily. You were told to produce Vietnamese
bodies, and if you didn't you were going to stay out in the field
longer. They learned pretty quickly that the command wasn't
discerning about what bodies were turned in, that just about any
Vietnamese bodies would do. This pushed American troops toward at
least calling in all Vietnamese who were filled as enemies, and
also to the killing of detainees and prisoners and civilians, and
calling them in as enemy dead.
This
coupled with the much higher level of strategic thinking like the
use of "free fire zones," which was basically a legal fiction that
the US came up with to open wide swaths of the countryside to
unrestrained bombing and artillery shelling. This caused tremendous
amounts of death and destruction in the country side. And it opened
it up to all this heavy firepower and made it inevitable that large
numbers of civilians would be killed or wounded.
What
Ewell did was unleash heavy fire power across the Mekong Delta,
which was the rice bowl of Vietnam and the most densely populated
area. He opened the countryside to unrestrained artillery fire,
bombing, and pushed his troops hard. His subordinates, the colonels
under his command, were constantly badgered about body count. He
demanded it, and if you didn't produce body count you were going to
be sacked, and somebody else would be brought in until he got
it.
Ewell's
signature operation was code-named Speedy Express. It began in
December 1968 and ran until the end of May 1969. Ewell's troops
reported almost 11,000 enemy dead, but they only recovered less
than 750 weapons. This great disparity was somehow ignored, as it
often was across the country, by reporters in Vietnam. But a couple
of years after Speedy Express ended, a stringer
at Newsweek got wind of the story. Alex Shimkin.
He felt that something extremely bloody had gone on in the Delta,
and he amassed some evidence and brought it to his bureau chief
Kevin Buckley. They came up with an estimate of 5,000 civilians
killed during the operation.
Their
report was heavily truncated by Newsweek, and the
story never got out in the fullest way that it could have. What
they didn't know is there had been a whistleblower in the military
who had let the high command know exactly what was going on in the
Delta. And what they also didn't know was that the military
conducted their own investigation, because they were afraid that
the Speedy Express story that Newsweek had would
blow up and become as big or bigger than the My Lai massacre story.
I found this in the National Archives. It had been buried for
decades. But the military's own estimate showed
that Newsweek probably underestimated the toll
there, total. The military estimated as many as 7,000 of the dead
were civilians. So 7,000 of 11,000. Just a devastating conclusion
that no one knew about for decades.
What Newsweek had was the stuff of Pulitzers or
Congressional investigations.
I always
thought it was very telling that at the time the My Lai massacre
took place there were somewhere between 500 and 700 reporters in
Vietnam. But when it was reported in the US, it was just a major
victory over enemy forces: 128 enemies killed at a cost of no US
lives. There was only a handful of weapons collected, but nobody
thought to ask any questions. Basically the military press releases
were just copied and put into the newspapers. It took a reporter
back in the US to finally break the story.
In
histories of the war, academics and scholars haven't wanted to draw
on what existed during the war, a fairly substantial anti-war
literature that talked about atrocities. Most of this was written
off as propaganda, and I think what seemed safe to talk about was
My Lai. And because Americans generally focus on the American side
of the war, it made it easy to do.
In other
cases, troops had this belief that Vietnamese spirituality said
that if the corpse wasn't intact, they wouldn't be able to move
into the afterlife. A lot of Americans would call it "Buddha
heaven." So they had this belief that dismembering Vietnamese would
be a form of psychological warfare. They would leave a "death
card," either an ace of spades playing card or a specially made up,
like a business card, with the unit's name on it and generally some
sort of grim motto attached.
There was
also an active trade in body parts in Vietnam. Ears were worn on
necklaces, one ear or maybe even a whole chain of ears. Some guys
wore these to show their combat prowess. Others would collect these
ears and sell them to people who wanted to project this image. In
one unit they were cutting off the heads of enemies, and anyone who
presented it to the commander got an extra beer ration. In one
case, a sergeant had cut off a head and he boiled the flesh of it,
and then traded the skull for a radio.
So it was
this flourishing sex trade and then out in the countryside there
was what seems to be a tremendous amount of rape and sexual
assault.
What I
found was extremely disturbing. I recount a few cases where the
sexual violence is really shocking. A lot of times I found myself,
I felt I didn't have the language to describe exactly what I found
in the cases, because rape or even gang rape didn't seem to convey
the level of sexual sadism. These are extremely violent gang rapes,
or raping women with inanimate objects like bottles or even
rifles.
When some
tiger cage prisoners were released, a Time magazine report said
'you can't really call them men anymore. They're more like shapes.'
They talk about them scuttling on the floor like crabs. If you
watch the video of it, that's really the case. It happened to women
too. Lower-limb paralysis from being chained so long in stress
positions. They can no longer stand and they had to crawl in a very
unnatural way.
This interview has been edited and condensed.
http://www.vice.com/read/vietnam-and-the-mere-gook-rule?utm_source=vicefbus