Should we have nuclear missle?

Sepecat SG

Another silly thread

playsprettyforbaby SG

interesting. but who would fund it? our overstretched taxpayers? nuclear development is a huge and ostentatious endeavour. and would it be wise to alienate all our allies for the sake of some weapons that we could probably never use for fear of similar retaliation? or worse, a pre-emptive strike from our neighbours before development, throwing our state into total war? just look at north korea/isreal/iran/india/pakistan. see what only a few nuclear developmental projects did to de-stabalise the region.

i think a measured response would be better. and the money would go to better places. such as.. fridges in every bunk for every section. haha. good for morale! or higher pay for everyone in the army!

sorry. rambling.

youyayu SG

if got

where to try the missle?

malaysia?

slim10 SG

Nuclearisation in the form of energy security ie nuke power plants are however not out of the question.

fudgester SG

Nuclearisation in the form of energy security ie nuke power plants are however not out of the question.

So..... what does that have to do with a nuclear missile?

HiAy3Captain SG

slim10 SG

So..... what does that have to do with a nuclear missile?

Many equate energy nuclearisation synonymously with weaponisation eg Iran's nuke program is widely regarded as a weapon's program. Even considering nuclear energy can be deemed provocative to some.

Aang SG

can give an example of "any nation who want to try funny stuff at us"?

we should start allow singaporeans to have guns, like AK 47 or M16, to strike back at "any one who want to try funny stuff at us", like the loan shark money collector.....

if u hav guns, those loansharks oso hav

« Previous Page