Originally posted by abnn:
[quote]Originally posted by nikoz:
[b]
First of all, we are only hearing one side of the story. For all we
know the TS's bro could be the one that was aggressive. He could
have been insisting that the dog was his. Just imagine you minding
your own business walking down a street with ur dog then out of the
blue a stranger comes out and accused you of stealing his dog 2
years ago when the dog is actually urs... would you not argue back
with him?
My bro was not aggressive, how can he be aggressive when he is with
his wife + 2 kidz (less than 2 yrs old)
This whole thing sounds a bit fishy to me. It could also be the guy
walking his dog felt threatened by her bro's attitude. And dont
think just because this guy is a NS police you can bully him. Cos
as long as he carrys the"police warrant card", he is more than able
the request to see tho not withhold ur IC, moreover he seemed to
have followed the proper procedure by giving her warnings 3
times.
so sorry to say, what's there to be fishy? he is not walking his
dog, but the dog is in his arm. and in the first place, you mean NS
police man will have "NS police" written on his forehead? And to
what i know, even a off duty policeman cannot request for IC.
(please any policeman correct me for this)
I believed they end up in the police station was apparently not the
TS's bro idea but rather the 2 NS policemen's decision. I am
assuming that both were NS policemen cos TS mentioned "asked her gf
to go up his hse to get his "police warrants". Awhile, his friend
came down with his gf, that guy shown the "police
warrants".
You are wrong again this time, the NS policeman did not even
mention to go police station, is my bro who want him to go with
him. And when my bro is heading to the station, he is still
reluctant to follow.
PS: I did not mention 2 NS policemen. if you cannot read the thread
properly then I rather you read it again before replying.
The police are not so dumb just to take the TS's bro's word for it,
They will also listen to the guy with the dog and his gf as well.
And dont for a minute think many would seriously belief the TS's
when she says..."actually my bro just wanna confirm the dog is in
good hand lor " Yea right! If that was really the case than i dont
think all these problem would have come up.
Yes indeed you are right, policemen will not ONLY take my bro's
word. They did interview for both party sepeartely. Ya if that guy
would allow the dog to be seen by my bro (or even more courteous)
then ya .. all these problem would not have come (I agree) but sad
to said ..
PS: NS police took out warrant give warning correct procedure ...
OMG
As for the NS policeman, you may be disappointed to know that Sg
police dont usually punish their own unless there are very damning
evidents which in this case there isn't only your words against
his, their words against yours won't be good enough. But ur bro may
have a record with the police after this case even tho how light it
may be, they could keep records like he would make claims of police
abuse of power quite easily and if future his words against any
other gov servant won't have much credibility
anymore.
Don't worry for this, the 2 big shot from the HQ has already given
my bro words that they will keep him update. what record will my
bro have? you mean complains record? ooooo i see ....
BTW, you know the power of civilian's mouth (complains) + the power
of MP ?
[/b]
My bro was not aggressive, how can he be aggressive when
he is with his wife + 2 kidz (less than 2 yrs old)
Dont for a minute think just be'cos he was with his wife + 2 kidz
he cant behave in an aggressive manner. We all know very well that
in such a situation, where argument gets overheated anything is
possible even if his grandfather was standing around there.
so sorry to say, what's there to be fishy? he is not
walking his dog, but the dog is in his arm. and in the first place,
you mean NS police man will have "NS police" written on his
forehead? And to what i know, even a off duty policeman cannot
request for IC. (please any policeman correct me for
this)
Well, fishy be'cos it was ur bro that approach him and not the
other way around. Moreover, ur dog was lost 2 yrs ago already. So
what if his dog was in his arms? He was also with his gf and they
could be just walking his dog. Like i've said, the guy was minding
your own business walking down a street with his dog, it was ur bro
that went up to him, what was exchanged during this time i think
its always hard to take the word of someone (In this case you) who
has a vested interest in it. It is not always ideal for any
policeman to flash his "warrant card" unnecessarily, the guy
mentioned didn't even carried his warrant card for that matter, he
could have decided to used it as a last resort in trying to cool
down ur bro.
You are wrong again this time, the NS policeman did not
even mention to go police station, is my bro who want him to go
with him. And when my bro is heading to the station, he is still
reluctant to follow.
PS: I did not mention 2 NS policemen. if you cannot read the thread
properly then I rather you read it again before
replying.
So you see, it was ur bro that was creating the trouble... Anyway,
put ur words properly if you dont want others to miss read it. Ur
sentence like:
So my bro went up and have a closer look, but the guy was like so nervous and asked
her gf (Shouldnt it be his?) to go up his hse to get his
"police warrants". Awhile, his friend came down with his
gf, that guy shown the "police warrants" (His friend that
guy shown his police warrant or warrants?) to my sis in law ask her
where she stay, my sis in law insists she is not going to say, that
guy then give her warnings around 3 times to ask her her
adddress.
When he gave her warnings 3 times and she refuse to co-operate, he
has a right to request that they go to a police station. Seems like
the guy didnt do anything wrong. He product his warrant card
followed by asking where she stay. If you all didnt do anything
wrong then why would you be afraid to tell a police, NS police
whatever still a police where you stay? Was ur bro behaving
aggressively in the first place that you forgot to mention?
Yes indeed you are right, policemen will not ONLY take my
bro's word. They did interview for both party sepeartely. Ya if
that guy would allow the dog to be seen by my bro (or even more
courteous) then ya .. all these problem would not have come (I
agree) but sad to said ..
PS: NS police took out warrant give warning correct
procedure
You have to ask yourself again if ur bro had displayed that manner
himself, would a dog owner be unpleasant towards him? Cos i've come
across many dog & cat owners who are more than happy to share a
word or two with regards to their pets. Just by ur repeated used
that the guy "NS police took out warrant give warning correct
procedure" Yes, I can only say if he feels that it is getting out
of hand he has a right to do that to try to cool things down. And
if he was the type that would flash his card in any small incident,
he would be carrying that card of his 24/7 and not leave it at
home.
Don't worry for this, the 2 big shot from the HQ has
already given my bro words that they will keep him update. what
record will my bro have? you mean complains record? ooooo i see
....
BTW, you know the power of civilian's mouth (complains) + the power
of MP ?
Yea i know, that is their normal response to almost every dick, tom
or harry's complain or report that they received, nothing unusual,
very business like but the next time ur bro gets a traffic summon
or dont pay his Tv licence on time... hehehe...
This whole thing is quite illogical, you seriously expect us here
to belief that ur bro was courteous and "actually my bro just wanna
confirm the dog is in good hand lor " would create so much
fuss?
Even i dont buy it, do you think the police will when they have
both sides statements rather than just from one side like we have
over here?