Pls refrain from country to country war scenarios, otherwise I
will have no choice but to close this thread.
Examples of statements that one should refrain from:
"Country X will surely whack Country Y's air force cos it has so
many more F-22s"
"20 planes vs 100, how to fight?"
"They surely die one la, maintainance so bad, personnel will be
caught with their pants down in a surprise attack"
"Country X people are lazy good for nothing idiots,
and they so poor some more, got air force meh?"
"LOL launch one missile they all die le"
I am sure many of us us here have seen many more of such
meaningless statements that obviously show a lack of understanding
of real world issues and that many underlying factors actually
play a part in the outcome of any potential conflict.
This is a forum for meaningful discussion for militarynuts, not
some chit chat session. If you want to post crap, go to chit
chat.
So please limit yourselves to a neutral, purely platform to
platform comparison. Example: The projected performance of the
APG-63(V)3 radar compared to conventional radars such as the
APG-68(V)9, the merits of each, and the detrimentals.
Chill out Delta,
This guy's not trolling so far. Besides, I just made a
point that u can't really compare platform to platform.
Especially in the context of whether the Sukhoi 30MKM poses a
threat to ASEAN.
No single platform is capable of taking down an entire IADS on
its own.
*not incl. of our classified gundams.