Ai Ya.My English is far from a model.But my gathering of info
not so bad.
The problem is not only your english, it's your inability to use
even common sense to make at least some basic logic of your own
quotes.
Have u read the first line and last line in my opening
post,dear?
It read:
Fantail
‘……can be scaled to
accommodate alternative payloads and
missions. ‘’
Yes I have read it, and I am telling you that ST unlike you, is
not to nonsensical as to design a UAV and scale it up (making
it more expensive) just to crash it into MBTs. When far better
technology for destroying stuff already exists... ala Hellfire or
Maverick which is over 10 times faster and far more
destructive.
How big do you think you want to scale it up to? The size of one
UH-1H?
2.It is not just the quantity of explosives u use,it is the design
of say anti--armour grenade
Do you even know how an anti-armour grenade works? Your posts
show your relative lack of understanding of even basic military
technology, wanting to imagine fantastic abilities for any of our
own stuff.
Do you know how EFP works? How HEAT works? How HESH works? No?
Then you are talking right out of not your mouth when you are
trying to imply that with a 0.4kg payload you can threaten an
MBT.
Fortunately, unlike you ST has far better idea of their own
technology and most importantly, its limits.
u use!!Read the STechnology products list and share ur view
here.
3.Read carefully
Yes, unlike you I've read it carefully and know how to apply
proper caution and common sense to what ST say, unlike you which
seems to take vauge statements made by ST to mean anything
fantastic when the limitations of the UAV design are quite
obvious.
That is what Fantail is strong at:
VTOL
Small size
This is what Fantail is poor at
Low payload (due to VTOL nature)
Low speed (easy to intercept)
Immediately you can tell Fantail, no matter how you scale it up
to, will not be as good as an attack platform as it is a recon one.
It's main strengths are in its VTOL ability and small size, not in
some macho fantasy idea of packing explosives into it and ramming
it into things when its of far more value in the recon role.
But seriously, its no surprise you demostrate the lack of
ability to make some sense of ST's comments on their own
weapons. What's next? The Terrex can be filled up with
explosives and rammed into the enemy? All these ideas can be done,
but they will not make much sense.
Do you think the Yanks see more sense in ramming Dragoneye into
insurgent positions or using it to recon?
How much do you really know about military technology anyway?
Your posts on our local technology are just cut-and-paste... at the
very least learn to make a proper commentary and know the LIMITS of
our own stuff. I don't think any SAF soldier will want to
fight a war next to your side given your "knowledge" of stuff.
Have you even served NS?
