Originally posted by specialOps:
hhaa this is a funny thread...because those who really know can't
speak, those who speak are talking crap.
i am beginning to suspect who this ray is....his questions are
strange.
Haha...true. Those that commented are probably not in any real
position of power
Reading this (ray243) comments in other threads suggests that s/he
thinks a war is as simple as a game of RTS.
Originally posted by NewAge:
Other trade routes sure but are u paying for the increase in
transportation cost? Are u taking the responsibility of the reduce
in profit?
Lets just assume u are M.
I will just send troops to johor and down to KL (by doing this i
secure my food and water supply).
Send a fleet to intercept yr ships in MOS while requesting
reinforcements from I.
Form an alliance with China, Vietnam, Japan Australia n Korea to
form a pincer attack with yr fleet in the south china
see.
C, K, J might not due to long standing rivalry between their
navies. Each have over 100 ships deployed as deterence against each
other, and I dont see that changing in short term.
So left A and V, which is still a serious threat to M.
Yes, as with common sense we will be sending troops into their
country, but since the enemy is blockading us, surely they would
have prepared themselves for this?
Also, I believe "I" will benefit in the short run from the closure
of MOS. The next free waterway into Asia will be Sunda
Strait.
Originally posted by maurizio13
Yup. Thats why my Enemy Mission 1 is a Naval Blockade. Time is
definitely on our Enemies side in the region.
Originally posted by ndmmxiaomayi:
Nice one...Breaking the Total Defence Strategy. I think that TD
strategy only looks nice on paper though. Cant really see it work
effectively during wartime.
But I dont think our communications can be broken so easily though,
coz most of the cables and lines are all placedunderground.
Destroying the above-ground centres is possible though.