Al Qaeda's world domination plan

Daniel-Lim SG

So, too, Genghis Khan. Yet...

jianfish9 SG

Some western powers will probably carry out a genocide before they even allow it to happen. Nowadays the US and allies like Israel are pretty careful when it comes to collateral damage and try to avoid hitting the non-militant muslims. But perhaps when the push comes to the shove, they will just bomb militants together with their sympathizers.

One-and-a-half Billion Muslims alot? There are as many Chinese and Indian also.

LazerLordz SG

You're seriously high on crack. They don't even fall into the same category.

Check the values alignment lah. Laughing

LazerLordz SG

This is what I fear.

guard_01 SG

wait until one of the countries come out with CDL, then bomb every terrorist's country, left only the innocident.

CDL=Colleral damage control

other wise...go all out. do no more FIBUA....just raze everything of their country to the ground....but no using nukes...

soulwinner SG

They will died out... Evil or Very Mad

Gauze SG

Rolf.

Muslim_| ----->
______|----->
Army__|----->

MohamedF SG

Really meh... I tot their mission was simply to drive Americans out of the middle east... Neutral Neutral Neutral

=Optimus= SG

They have no modern industry (they dun believe in science and technology) they have no modern weapons (except for few pieces of stinger at most?), they can't and will not win Rolling Eyes

Lighty SG

They get their weapons mostly from russia

beavan SG

who they want to destroy too.

=Optimus= SG

well a few crates of AKs and Dshk doesnt make them any powerful

Arapahoe SG

they won't die out.

ktk SG

i rather overestimate em than underestimate.

look,
USA underestimated the al queda and paid with the twin towers and 5000 lives.

but really, a nuke ends war faster than the time needed to speak "collateral damage"

ask the japs. Wink

tankfanatic SG

They have no modern industry (they dun believe in science and technology) they have no modern weapons (except for few pieces of stinger at most?), they can't and will not win

they probably wont win but they can and able to destroy the big guys.... war is not tit for tat ... even small thing can create big consequences.. asymetric warfare have been have been proven to make big power goes bankrupt ...or its economy destroyed.....

gigabyte14 SG

all talk and no action makes osama a comedian.

tankfanatic SG

all talk and no action makes osama a comedian

but his vacation movie really makes bush on fire....here at the white house bush receive a lot of spank from his action in iraq...then the man he hated most come out in his newest vacation movie... lol

|-|05| SG

Well if and when they use WMD's then that's it...the gloves come off and then it's the end.
Force on force....WMD's respond with WMD's

LazerLordz SG

Asymmetric warfare is only effective in nations under the "tyranny of the majority". It has never worked in totalitarian states where the government does not have to answer to the public's sensitivities.

E.g Russia in the Chechen conflict. Whenever a Russian soldier is killed by a militant, the militant's family will be tracked down and held hostage. Sometimes the Russian regular forces will simply kill or threaten the militant's family with torture.

Can a liberal democracy get away with this?

Arapahoe SG

The case of defeating terrorist is to defeat the will to commit sucida attack on civilian target, and I think it is better to work with the cleric leaders not to sell knife. Dispell the myth of islam, consolidate the teaching and set in main stream.

I think right now it is tribal islam on a global scale, whoever wish to be heard in the lslamic leadership and gain political recognition just attack the west.

« Previous Page Next Page »