I don't think the kind of war the SAF fights is one that is for
explicitly offensive gains. A pre-emptive strike is possible but I
highly doubt it is our plan to go all imperial-japanese on other
nations- and I certainly hope not. The NSF duty is to protect
Singapore and what the matters, not go about some political
hyperpower projection.
As for victory disease I think you have to win some victories first before you
can get it. Defeated armies tend to change and learn from their
mistakes while an opponent that has won might be tempted to keep to
an increasingly outdated battle plan.
I for one do not think that the average soldier of the SAF cannot
fight if push comes to shove, but leadership is another big
issue... where a lot of the higher leaders might not be fighting
men as much as they tend to be book-smart scholars farming cash
with little idea of what is happening on the ground.
I think "peacetime disease" is a larger problem for the SAF, where
the whole thing becomes so tilted towards standards, apperances and
processes to run the military so efficently in peacetime that
actual combat ability is compromised. That is a greater danger I
think... I wonder how the nation would react if NSFs really had to
fight in some conflict... would the parents start to protest?