Obviously,you've missed the entire idea of this issue. Which is
to discuss the virtues and limitations of the various military
formations. And like I've earlier posted, if the moderator/s feel
that this thread is giving people ideas, I've advised that it be
closed. My track record here has been to raised issues, you may ask
forumnites such as Gedaken, Fudgester, that many issues such as
possible actions that the SAF/SPF might take in the event of
terrorist attacks in unprotected civilian installations have been
mentioned once before. My sole intention of joining this forum and
putting postings is to seek opinion and views.Honestly, this thread
is up just to study the various formations that have been used
since Napoleonic Times, it is not to incite ideas for creativity to
troublemakers or potential troublemakers.
Infact, there are a bazillion websites/books available which
discusses the virtues of various formations and the use of
weaponry/types of troops effectively. So if you are telling me to
exercise restraint/responsibility in my posts, it is noted. But
however if you are asking me not to seek the opinions of others in
the forum on their views, wouldn't that have defeated the purpose
of having forums in the first place?
And regarding the SPF Ammo SOP,irregardless of whether HQ NCC / HQ
NPCC has resolved it, it was honest to god oversight, we all do
make mistakes at some point in time and I sincerely apologized if
it has stirred the pot or rock the boat violently.
Once again to moderators, please close this thread if it is deemed
to be suggestive, violence inciting, potentially trouble-making,
stoking the fire, stirring the pot or whatsoever. I thank you
sincerely for it.Many thanks to the folk who have contributed to my
thread and sorry if I've caused trouble to any of you.