erm, well if I'm allowed to imagine. I figure its pretty much
the same way computer hardware works. IE. Drivers.
Previously, hardware devices weren't all plug and play. Hence a
driver is required to help interface the device to the computer.
Eg, say you bought some really cool multi button optical mouse 2
years ago. U need to install the mouse software before u can use
it. Its all about bridging the interface, from the human user, to
the device, to the computer, to binary bits.
Im guessing it works similarly with aircraft weapon systems
components. Though the aircraft purchas is stated to be capable of
using certain weapons, source codes ( smth like drivers ) must be
loaded to "tell" the jet's computer how to use it.
When M'sia first bought their bugs, together with them, came
Harpoons, Mavericks, Sidewinders and Sparrows. There was no mention
of any PGMs like laser guided bombs(except mavericks). In fact,
there was no mention of any kinda bombs... Perhaps this suggests
that their Hornet's air to surface capability is limited to
Harpoons and Mavericks?? I find it a bit hard to believe... surely
it must have retained some ability to drop some Mk-82-84s...?
Part 1 was just guessing on my part. Since the Israelis operated
F-16s too, particularly, Block 50/52s, we most probably would have
gotten some codes from them to integrate weapons such as the
python4, (who knows, even derbys). With the new Block 60, i'm sure
there will be vast changes in the jet's computer architecture since
its supposedly using a faster processor. Hence, for the RSAF to buy
and use the F-16 Block 60, would prolly leave us wondering how to
integrate our "other" weapons with it.
On the other hand, the F-15Es, would come already capable of a wide
variety of roles, + the IAF is already operating their locally
modified version of the Strike Eagle, we still might have the
option of getting their help with integrating "other" weapons with
it. But damn... the Strike Eagles, the way things look at the
moment are already very capable!
