0lala SG After all that so called 'strong resistance' they claimed their civilians and troops weere able to stand up against the germans. They gave themselve up after juz 2 weeks. So why should they be granted a permanent seats in the UN council?
ditzy SG If going by your above logic, Singapore doesn't even deserve a voice in the UN. Don't use the british occupation on me.
0lala SG juz after world war 2 begin,their french resistance was overwhelmed by the germans Their entire civilians dropped their weopons and their troops,the white flag. casualties too the lowest,less than 10000 I say they dun deserve
0lala SG Constructive comment leh What has it to do with pap I wanna know the opinions of others why france shld be granted a permanent seats among the UN
ditzy SG It has nothing to do with the PAP, like nothing to do with the french not being able to resist and seat in the UN.
missqi SG Your O levels are in one month. And you can worry about why France has a permanent seat. Very smart. You want to retake O's ah(again)?
ditzy SG Its as good as saying france doesn't deserve a permanent seat in the UN because of the World Cup 2006 headbutt.
scabstermooch SG Keep spouting those those... The french suffered ALOT of casualties; up there (or even more than) Britain and the US. So stop believing the anti-french propoganda spewed by red-neck americans after the French refused to join in the crusade.
#$%^&* SG Sawadee Khap..... Bonjour, monsieur. If you check carefully the winners of the WW2 made themselves the permanent members of the UN security council. Each one of them is a major winner of the war. They also gave themselves veto power. This has nothing to do with fairness or who deserve what. This has to do with realpolitik. Now fast forward 60 years. Some countries think veto power is unfair. Some countries want a reform of the security council. Kofi Annan tries very hard to reach a compromise, but as you know it's still ongoing.
