Should never confuse the matter that at the point of sales of
any weapons, is between legitimate governments, be they viewed as
rogue nations by others or not. They may be rogue to some but not
to others. To be rogue to all will simply mean they are not of this
world.
Go according to the concept - "if I am in charge of what I have, be
it owned by someone else or not, I have the right to do whatever I
want with it" and not "I can only do what other people like or want
me to do".
The key word is "sovereign". No one, not even the world, has the
right to say things that would sway the interests of individual
nations. To do so is declare absolute war on the nation. So, any
united world effort to pinpoint violations of rights by one people
against another can only be fulfilled by means of all-out war to
mete out the so-called "justice" absolute.
And the essence and truth behind this scheme of things is contrary
to the accusing parties' pre-occupation of "rights". The fact is
very clear - only the accuser has the right of everything. And it
is with this sickeningly injustice of the generic accusers, namely
the Western world and their so-called organisations - e.g. WWF, UN,
NATO, IMF etc that are actually de-stabilising the world and not
the other way around.