completeness SG as above. I heard that older men 40 + will have lower quality genes due to their years and that younger men will father better quality good looking intelligent children. how true is this statement?
jam on a bread SG Fake. It depends how the upbringing is. if you dun take care of urself or dun bother to enrich yourself..you can never be good looking or intelligent.
TehJarVu SG my dad gave birth to me when he was 50+ my eldest brother is the smartest (he's a scholar!), but i'm better looking
gohkatkat SG better looking???neh......i think it all lies in the genes.......but the chance of a child being born with inherited down syndrome and other fatal diseases are generally lower when you are young..........
cck_190 SG young better. why? cos men at young age not working at high position jobs. hence, will be able to spend more time with kid. besides...telling your friends "I have a 30 y.o. active young dad" sounds better than saying,"my boring dad is 45"
starblue SG actually hor, i tot this topic should concentrate on whether having children when younger is better for the father. not the son loh.. for christ’s sake…
Kawazoe SG my dad gave birth to me when he was 50+i think this is the world's first case, lets call guiness world of records!!!
jaydunkfull SG definitely not! if you have kids young, you 1) lose time for building your career 2) get tied down by kids much earlier 3) get grumpy wives who get stressed from looking after the kids 4) no time to have fun when youre young 5) no time with your wife since shes gonna be occupied with the kid and a whole list of disadvantages. leave child bearing till an older age when a guy has finished enjoying life and is ready to settle down with kids. but i have to admit that a young father with kids is more visually appealing
toyota-corolla SG i have a boring dad which is 52years old and now i'm 15 monent my dad retire, i have to start working
