Bus Contracting Model (part 2)

last SG · 2016-06-30T16:00:51+00:00

Hopefully somebody here would not compared our GCM with Australia i hope..Aussie is Aussie and Sg is Sg..why not?

SMB128B SG

Who say they dont prioritise customers over BCs?We request that S43 last bus stops before turning right to Buangkok Dr also they don't care

That's not my point bro...

I was saying how LTA always uses top-down approaches... You got me wrong...

Your example is exactly what I am saying... LTA serve for themselves and never for the common people...

So you all can DREAM ON about a new terminal being built... coz in LTA eyes we are just poor losers who did not "work hard enough" to get up on their level...

Just look at what the Son of Punggol said and you will get what I mean...

carbikebus SG

WLDEP driver driving AMDEP bus?

Welcome to BCM.Already inside the package although SBST/SMRT hasn't really enforced it.

SBS3004X SG

Loyang package should have included 969.

iveco SG

Loyang package should have included 969.

No, it shouldn't. It should have included 109 and 117 and excluded 136.

Smilarly, Seletar should have included 169 and 136 while excluding 76.

In the same vein, Bulim should have contained 61 instead of 66.

sgbuses SG

I suppose the 2/3 advertising rule is another Transperth idea:

Though AOAs do occasionally show up (but the Transperth logo and operator decal must remain present):

dupdup77 SG

Loyang package should have included 969.

Hi mr sbs3004X, on what account and reason to include 969 since it starts from tampines and woodlands which are not inside the interchanges for contract for Go Ahead Singapore? Cheers. Thanks.

SBS3004X SG

Hi mr sbs3004X, on what account and reason to include 969 since it starts from tampines and woodlands which are not inside the interchanges for contract for Go Ahead Singapore? Cheers. Thanks.

Loyang only has SBST services, so it should include 969 (and maybe 67) from Tampines, which is not very far from LYDEP.

SBS3004X SG

Hi mr sbs3004X, on what account and reason to include 969 since it starts from tampines and woodlands which are not inside the interchanges for contract for Go Ahead Singapore? Cheers. Thanks.

Hi mr dupdup77, on what account and reason to include 800, 803, 804, 805, 806, 811, 812 etc since it starts from yishun which are not inside the interchanges for contract for Seletar package? Cheers. Thanks.

SBS3004X SG

854 should go under Bedok package, or the package will only have SBST services.

Eunos and Lor 1 Geylang can be in same GCM package. (As in the ones open for bidding.)

TPS Timothy Mok SG

Loyang only has SBST services, so it should include 969 (and maybe 67) from Tampines, which is not very far from LYDEP.

61 is going to Serangoon-Eunos Bus Package.

67 is going to Choa Chu Kang Bus Package.

117 is going to Sembawang-Yishun Bus Package.

SBS3004X SG

61 is going to Serangoon-Eunos Bus Package.

67 is going to Choa Chu Kang Bus Package.

117 is going to Sembawang-Yishun Bus Package.

No, I am referring to the packages contracted out by LTA, not the negotiated ones.

SBS3004X SG

(Fictitious) Ulu Pandan Bus Package:

Interchanges: Bukit Merah, New Bridge Road

Services:

SBST: 5, 16, 57, 93, 120, 121, 122, 123/M, 131/M, 132, 145, 174, 195, 192, 272, 273, 400, 402

SMRT: 167, 176, 184*, 190

*184 amended to Clementi - Bukit Panjang (Loop)

TPS Timothy Mok SG

Service 883: Sembawang - Yishun (Loop) via Canberra Estate, to relieve loading of 117. Just wondering why you want 883 when there is 117?

The 883's suggestion: Yishun Ave 7, Sembawang Rd, Yishun Ave 5, Yishun Ave 2. Chong Pang is the main focus.

I think the PAP likes to go downhill. Sooner you will ever see new PM, and losing of - Jurong GRC, Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC and Ang Mo Kio GRC, not just overall 20-25 constituencies.

SBS n SMRT SG

https://www.lta.gov.sg/apps/news/page.aspx?c=2&id=dfea0251-d871-4c2e-a415-261184e4b602

Service 883 launched Oct 23. No diversion of 117 guys. Official info. First bus service launched under gcm

carbikebus SG

No, it shouldn't. It should have included 109 and 117 and excluded 136.

Smilarly, Seletar should have included 169 and 136 while excluding 76.

In the same vein, Bulim should have contained 61 instead of 66.

Bulim:Should not include 96 and Clementi Feeders but can give TT Boon Lay svc like 174,174e,179 & 181.

Loyang:Should not include Punggol also,11km from Loyang to Punggol leh.Can give partial of Tampines.But again if LTA insists on Punggol,Just take those svc that end at Eastern side like 3,34,43/M,62 & 118.Pasir Ris can kapo 58 & 88.Changi Village can take 109 while Changi Bus Park can kapo 47.Tampines can kapo 19,29,39 & 81.

carbikebus SG

Seletar:Should include 136 & 166.

SBS351M SG

https://www.lta.gov.sg/apps/news/page.aspx?c=2&id=dfea0251-d871-4c2e-a415-261184e4b602

Service 883 launched Oct 23. No diversion of 117 guys. Official info. First bus service launched under gcm

See the BSEP logo there? Its still launched under BSEP.

carbikebus SG

Heard from M A N Technicians that come to Loyang to inspect SMRT A95s that from next year,LTA will transfer some A95s to GA also.I don't inow about A22 though.

dupdup77 SG

Service 883: Sembawang - Yishun (Loop) via Canberra Estate, to relieve loading of 117. Just wondering why you want 883 when there is 117?

The 883's suggestion: Yishun Ave 7, Sembawang Rd, Yishun Ave 5, Yishun Ave 2. Chong Pang is the main focus.

I think the PAP likes to go downhill. Sooner you will ever see new PM, and losing of - Jurong GRC, Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC and Ang Mo Kio GRC, not just overall 20-25 constituencies.

Hi mr TPS Timothy Mok, 883 is to connect sembawang road, Canberra st, canberra way to sembawang and yishun. Something like mini feeder. Not to rob passengers from 117. Cheers. Thanks.

SBS3004X SG

883 should be under WLDEP. They have so many SG plate green A22s.

« Previous Page Next Page »