Bus Terminal, Interchanges & Depots (Part 2)

last SG · 2017-06-22T13:43:08+00:00

Just what I about to sayWell, low post counts and joined date is so suspicious. Not only that, that joker also went MIA.

SMB145B SG

Lol like dat 170A oso give the same purpose also mah

unlike 950, 170 have no other options.

but 170A terminates at WTCP, 170X neither starts from Queen St nor terminates at Larkin Sentral.

950A would make it look like 856A

lemon1974 SG

Just before the opening of Bukit panjang ITH, bukit panjang MP is appealing to LTA to revise some of the routes as he have receive lot of feedback n complains from residents

I tot LTA have talk to the grassroots ppl/residents etc when they are making changes to the routes ? Or they think that these are minor routes changes so no need to discuss or consult?

SMB1368T SG

That was what exactly happened when 76 was amended...but theres nothing we can do since its too late

carbikebus SG

Actually 184 should start from the ITH also..

SG5064X SG

Just before the opening of Bukit panjang ITH, bukit panjang MP is appealing to LTA to revise some of the routes as he have receive lot of feedback n complains from residents

I tot LTA have talk to the grassroots ppl/residents etc when they are making changes to the routes ? Or they think that these are minor routes changes so no need to discuss or consult?

171 & 983 skipping Jelebu Road is pretty ridiculous

AJQZC SG

171 & 983 skipping Jelebu Road is pretty ridiculous

If LTA wants to make any further amendments to these, they ought to do it soon.

phillipC SG

171 & 983 skipping Jelebu Road is pretty ridiculous

Somehow i feel Sv 180 best to start at BPITH as well. instead they put 2 queue inside the interchange for LRT breakdown. One towards Petir and one toward Senja. Expect more LRT breakdowns i guess. Compared previously, Sv 180, 184,75 and 700, 971E, 177 all not calling the BPITH. The planning really gone haywired.

AJQZC SG

Because of the fuss of having to fit the bus interchange in a shopping mall, thus ITH. (So probably limited parking space for services). Just look at Serangoon for example.

SG5064X SG

180 can actually be amended back when 979M is integrated with 979.

SG5064X SG

If LTA wants to make any further amendments to these, they ought to do it soon.

They should delay the ITH opening to October and replan the amendment/extension/change in stopping points.

carbikebus SG

970 & 973 should stay at BPJ Temp park..

180 & 184 should be at the ITH

iveco SG

176 should bypass BPJ town itself and termimate at BPBP, since there already are 963 and 970 to BPJ.

170X should be extended to BPJ, renumbered 974 and operated alongside 950 in Woodlands contract.

SMB315C SG

I am not sure if anyone asked about this before, but there is an additional queue rack recently installed for Berth 10 (856/925/950) at Woodlands Temporary Interchange, right beside 950's queue rack. From the direction itself, it is not meant to be an extension for 950's queue though. Although introduction of new services do not per se warrant installation of new queue racks at berths, can someone enlighten me about its purpose?

Has been there since the start.. It's actually meant for the MRT shuttle.. 950 pax usually queue along this queue rack..

gekpohboy SG

Actually, considering Bukit Panjang Bus Interchange has 20 parking lots and 2 feeder services, it can only accommodate 4 trunk services.

This is because 2 feeders would require 8 parking lots (1 feeder - 4 parking lots). The remaining 12 parking lots can only accommodate 4 trunk services (1 trunk - 3 parking lots).

Yet, there are 6 trunks: 176, 970, 972, 973, 975, 979.

Can consider relocating 972 and 973 to the temporary bus park.

carbikebus SG

Heard the temp CCK int have 35 lots for 12m buses and 10 lots for 18m buses

carbikebus SG

I got a feeling that svc 45 & 268 will move to Yio Chu Kang Int once the expansion is completed

BusAnalayzer SG

I got a feeling that svc 45 & 268 will move to Yio Chu Kang Int once the expansion is completed

I would prefer 265. 45 and 268 should stay as they are as they provide connection between the industrial estate and AMK town.

CZT SG

I would prefer 265. 45 and 268 should stay as they are as they provide connection between the industrial estate and AMK town.

hard to say also. Actually is there a lot of ppl heading that direction in the morning? If not 70 can always take the load...?

iveco SG

I would prefer 265. 45 and 268 should stay as they are as they provide connection between the industrial estate and AMK town.

265 and 268 under Seletar contract while 45 under Bedok. AMDEP is managed by Bishan contract. Having 265 and 268 start from AMDEP is an anomaly.

SMB145B SG

265 and 268 under Seletar contract while 45 under Bedok. AMDEP is managed by Bishan contract. Having 265 and 268 start from AMDEP is an anomaly.

just extend 265 and 268 to SLDEP.

« Previous Page Next Page »