I don't need reminders to remind me how 969 can get very packed
during peak hours I have experienced it before.
Yes. No one likes to take winding route when they are in a hurry
but have you try to be flexible where there is no 969 in sight, or
969 has to skip certain stops due to full loadings and rather than
to complain 969 doesn't have enough DDs, shouldn't you do something
about it, rather than waiting for the next 969, why not find a way
out if you know the next 969 is going to take a long time to
arrive? For Instance If I do not see 969, and 39,85 and 858 arrives
first and alight at Jalan Kayu, Then take 168 and alight near
Tampines One and that will save time rather than to wait for 969
and end up late.
For 161/168's case I believe most people (especially the RP/TP*
students) see this as their fastest way home in Tampines/Woodlands
and 969 just takes way too long which is why they have more DDs
than any other services.
*For 168 only
Do you even know wtf u talking about... You arw shooting
yourself all over...
First you ADMIT 969 can get v packed, even EXPERIENCED before...
So whats ur prob with adding more DDs to this svc, seeing how even
with its current number of DDs this svc couldnt cope with the
pax?!
Another thing... You say 168 is diff case coz 969 is "way too
long"... 39 is longer than that you know!! And so are ANY of your
alternatives! Yet you say ppl always have these choices and hence
no need add DDs!!
Wake up your bloody idea!!
So now when there are not enough supply you think it's the pax
fault! What Cock logic is this? Hey, then what is BSEP for? Liddat
your pretty little 972 also dont need so much DDs la... If cannot
board 972, DONT COMPLAIN!!! Go take 190... Or 700...
Anyways I have no idea what your entire post is about actl...
Haha