Thanks. It is really the same case for 240, 242, 243G/W, 333,
335. 241 and 334 is a bit different. They haven't spammed many
buses on these services but maintained full fleet DD which is right
thing to do. The same should have been done with 240, 243, 291, 293
instead of spamming so many buses, clogging interchange, roads,
wasting fuel and BC resources.
I think feeders with high loading should follow what they did
for 241, it is the first feeder to get a full AC/WAB DD fleet in
2014-15 with the upper deck of DDs being well utilized during both
peak and off-peak despite being a short route
243G/W is a very good example of spamming too many SDs, even 242
is spammed with way too many buses to the point where 242
tends to bunch at the looping point
241's loading is what I think is one of the highest among
feeders where AM off-peak buses towards Pioneer MRT can hit over
40-50 pax at times (before 1-2pm which is the after school
hours)