The word is not smart or not smart. I feel that JC are people
who are more motivated to concentrate on their studies, therefore
achieving gd results. While Poly people tend to play more than
their effort in study, only start study when near exam. I say this
as a general term. Of course there will be exception in every case
like JC CMI or Poly got straight A student. I m a poly student b4
by e way. I think the reason most of us ended up in Poly is that
our o-level we never really make an effort from the very
beginnning, only start towards the 3 quarter of the yr and some
even last min. Most of you guys, dont u wish u had a chance to go
JC if it is possible? after all sch fees are cheaper, the route to
Uni is wider. again. i say Most. not all. Some of u will have a
preference for Poly instead. But i believe most of the ppl here
will always harbour a dream of If Oni i can get into Jc. its like
in your Primary sch, where u hope to get EM1 instead of EM2 or Em3.
In seconday school where u hope to get into express instead of
normal.
Aniway i wonder why the author make such a remark. What is she
trying to prove aniway? There is no definate answer JC ppl are
better than Poly. What are we comparing? Book Smart? Survival
Skills? Can she prove that all JC people are better? What she can
provide is that she based her assumption on the Generalised O-Level
results oni and the university intake for JC students compared to
Poly, and the behavior of some. To be honest it doesnt matter who
is smarter. JC people or Poly. There will never be a conclusion. So
my advice is dont get upset over this. Let these shallow people
think what they like.
There will always be people who are better than u. If you think JC
people are better than poly, thenthe public sentiments is that poly
girls are more pretty than JC people. Fair enough? Of course it
isnt, coz it is just an assumption as there will be pretty, and no
so pretty one in each department
