Why RAH-66? Whats wrong with the AH-64? RAH-66 is faster but
lighter, AH-64 slower but can carry more stuff, better suited to
bust tanks. . . but the RAH-66 sure LOOKS cool. . .
And to reiterate what others have said. . ., go easy on the new
paper... and its tabloid in the first place, most of its staff
would be worried about the latest trend among the young people
(>35 or so), the teens, and the sports (esp. soccer) that people
are interested in. Their target audience is not a bunch of crazies
like us. . . basically, having said that though, i think they
shouldn't publish such stuff which IS outside their scope and have
never heard off in their life. . . hopefully they either learn to
shuddup on such issues in future or get someone with an idea of
what is going before they start writing rubbish.. . .
and notice most of the reported stuff are stuff that have been
CONSIDERED by the various countries, not neccessarily bought, so
will someone who has the article kindly check and see if it is an
expected procurement list OR a 'bought list'
