subarul gal,
u have to look at this in a different angle...yes can blame the
parents for not looking after the child....and we know thre are
dangers out there...but just coz a gal is alone, naive,
defenceless, does not mean that any one can take advantage of the
situation...u can say the parents neglegence and may think they
have somethhing to do wif the murder...or may "made" "create" a
scenerio so that the gal could be harmed and her death making a
wave of anger amongst the common folks and they can walk away with
whatever gains from HN's death...but do we have a proof on that?
May be we should include neglegence on HN parents part but is there
a pwoerful lawyer with took's to point this out and mayb bring HN's
parents to justices? What i ahve written here is already out of the
records and even if took paid a good lawyer it would have been to
lessen his own punishment or better can tok the court out of him
not being guilty of murder!
In simple bedtime story, the queen can own the kingdom after the
princess' death but to do so she has to throw her to the wolves
while taking a stroll with her in the forest.
when the righteous knights arrived, they have to slaughter the
wolves and overthrow the queen to preserve justice. but without
proof of what is going on in the heart of the queen, it is very
difficult to convict her while it is easier to punish the wolves
since from their actions they are already worng. If the wolves
happened to be full and not lusting for man flesh that day, nothing
would have happened and the queen may have to come up with another
plan
