Depends on what kind of evolution la. Darwinism abit out date
liao.
i would beg to differ. unlike the creationism theory, science
isn't constrained by verses in the bible and ecclesiastical
doctrines. if you have read the economist recently, there is an
article touching upon the legal tussle by human rights group in
America to sanction the teaching of creationism theory, albeit
under the guise of intelligent design.
and for your information there is no "what kind of evolution".
being unconstrained by any form of third party control, research
have been shown sometimes to be contridictory to general thought of
evolution. hence breakaway/newer scientific readmendments to
darwin's theory of evolution. instead of taking Darwinism, you
should instead approach the topic of just Evolution. Darwin merely
sparked off a new area of research and do not dictate the ending.
Bear in mind that unlike the creationism theory where we already
have all the accumulative evidence in the form of the gospels and
the Bible, science change with technological advancement.
just as we do not blame early scientists for claiming the earth is
in the centre of the universe, we should not fault darwin for any
mistake. if any, we thank these scientists for being the purveyors
of truth.
if there's anything to go by, the Church has always been stagnating
the progress of Science. i need not remind you about the
incarceration of Gaileo who eventually turned out to be correct. so
is the bible 100% accurate? i again, beg to differ
