Your reply is bordering on the strawman's argument. And your
analogy of the cake disappearing is false analogy. So there are at
least two logical fallacies in your reply.
.. 'cos you conveniently forget there is creation science. I
wouldn't argue for the strength of the evidence presented by
creationists, but at least there are scientific evidence put
up.
Christians are goondu? Don't think so. You may like to argue with
some of them. You can try Dr. Duane Gish for starters. 
So..stop all the hubris about how christians good lah what not
lah..for goodness sake...the proliferation of the religion is based
on bloodshed during the crusades and all..are you telling me that
having war upon those who do not share you believes and forcing it
upon them , and by sheer scale, the religion spreads, and becomes
believed, that it becomes true?
Qualify your statement. What are the statistics?
Did the religion proliferate, like you said, based on bloodshed? I
have some rudimentary knowledge of history and I knew the
Inquisition and Crusade were largely unsuccessful at converting the
Jews.
The religion also proliferated by peaceful evangelism. True the
colonists made it possible for evangelism to happen, but people
converted not 'cos they were forced upon. Evangelism is still
happening today and there is minimal bloodshed. In fact I argue the
evangelist's blood is more often shed than their targets.
Like that we are like typical Singaporeans ah, gahmen say we
have the freedom of press is a good thing, we also nod head..yes
sir yes sir three fucking bags full of shit...
Compared to Myammar(?) we are way better. I read now or last
time they must register to use a modem.
