Icemoon said:
Many forummers are impressionable. I think you had SIS and
MCSquare fooled heh. Luckily Northwind only agreed "to an
extent".
I agreed with the idea of willful ignorance being
annoying...Let's not get manipulative...
The Holy Quran was passed down a different way. The 'Holy' title is
most deserving. The Prophet Mohammed (PBUH), supposedly an
illiterate, wrote the book with the angel Gabriel dictating to him
in a cave. None of the biblical books were written this
way.
Is it? Can you please provide an account of in what environment
and by whom the present books of the bible were written?
'cos the Prophet never admitted Jesus is God in the Trinity. If you
believe the Prophet, then you have to reject the biblical version.
Take your pick.
And Jesus never said he was God either. The original translation
was Light.
You have Jews and Christians reading the same books. (in the OT)
Then you have Muslims who say those books are corrupted. No way we
can test it. Neither can Muslims prove their version is most
uncorrupted.
There were no Christians at the time of the OT, and the OT that
was around were also many different books, some of which are
definitely no longer included in the Bible.
You have to thank God for that. Imagine the whole world
Christians very united one big family. They will surely affect
govt. and politics. They will lobby like siao. Maybe they will ban
evolution. Maybe they will ban condoms. Too scary liao.
No, you can thank Man for that.