sir_peanuts SG toyota camry 2.0L (2005)Ron 95 petrol 57.78 L (full tank)Distance travelled = 456KmFC= 7.89 Km / Lmostly urban driving. is that considered bad?
carbikebus SG toyota camry 2.0L (2005)Ron 95 petrol 57.78 L (full tank)Distance travelled = 456KmFC= 7.89 Km / Lmostly urban driving. is that considered bad?Thought my friend Camry can get 8km/L.He's working at town area.
lianamaster SG toyota camry 2.0L (2005)Ron 95 petrol 57.78 L (full tank)Distance travelled = 456KmFC= 7.89 Km / Lmostly urban driving. is that considered bad?My friend claimed he can squeeze 10km/l out of it from his Camry 2.0 (2008)Dunno true or not.
alleggerita SG toyota camry 2.0L (2005)Ron 95 petrol 57.78 L (full tank)Distance travelled = 456KmFC= 7.89 Km / Lmostly urban driving. is that considered bad?rather bad when you consider the fact that a 2.4-litre engine achieves about 7km/l.
mh2 SG toyota camry 2.0L (2005)Ron 95 petrol 57.78 L (full tank)Distance travelled = 456KmFC= 7.89 Km / Lmostly urban driving. is that considered bad? should be 8 or 9 la..vtti engine lay...unacceptable
nightsky87 SG should be 8 or 9 la..vtti engine lay...unacceptableBut mostly urban mah.. 8 or 9 I think highly achievable if mix urban+highway..
alleggerita SG But mostly urban mah.. 8 or 9 I think highly achievable if mix urban+highway..if urban:highway is 50:50 i think can achieve 10km/l