2010 Cambridge H2 Chem P3 Qns :
[QUOTE=midoforce]what's the bond angle between NO2 and O3, must
be exactly accurate, not a range[/QUOTE]
NO2 : 134.3 deg
O3 : 116.8 deg
If (assuming) the Cambridge Mark Scheme is reasonable and
fair, they will accept any reasonable angle approximately 120
deg (eg. for NO2, based on the trigonal planar electron geometry),
provided you gave valid rationale (eg. "the single unpaired
electron on the N atom takes up less space than a lone pair, hence
the bond angle will be expected to be greater than 120 deg, eg. 130
deg").
Glutamic acid: HOOCCH2CH2CH(NH2)COOH (they gave skeletal but i
cant draw it here)
There are 3 pKa values associated with glutamic acid: 2.1, 4.1,
9.5
Make use of these pKa values to suggest major species present in
solutions of glutamic acid with the following pH values
pH1
pH3
pH7
pH11
pH 1
HOOCCH2CH2CH(NH3+)COOH
pH 3
HOOCCH2CH2CH(NH3+)COO-
pH 7
-OOCCH2CH2CH(NH3+)COO-
pH 11
-OOCCH2CH2CH(NH2)COO-
The idea is to, as you go from acidic environment to
alkaline environment, deprotonate step-by-step one at a
time (initially in very acidic conditions all groups are
protonated; next deprotonate 1st the alpha carboxylic
acid, then 2ndly the R group carboxylic acid, then 3rdly the
ammonium group).
The alpha carboxylic acid is stronger than the R group
carboxylic acid, due to the electron-withdrawing by induction
effect of the (+vely charged) amine group.
-------------------------------------
-------------------------------------
Structure of NO2 :
NO2 has an unpaired electron (free radical) on N, which
is doubly bonded to an O atom, and singly datively
bonded to another O atom. The N atom has a +ve charge, the singly
bonded O atom a -ve charge, and the doubly bonded O atom has no
charge. N lacks a stable octet in NO2, and the molecule is a free
radical.
-------------------------------------
Why FO2 doesn't exist :
Reason #1
The problem with FO2, is that F (being in period
2), cannot expand its octet (since it doesn't have vacant,
energetically accessible 3d orbitals to use). Hence, it cannot
form a similar structure as ClO2, which has expanded its octet
(4 bond pairs + 2.5 lone pairs on Cl = 11 electrons in terms of an
expanded octet).
Reason #2
For FO2 to have single bonds between the F and two O
atoms, F will gain a 2+ charge and each O atom with gain
a -ve charge, and this separation of charge is
destabilizing, since F is more electronegative than O.
Reason #3
In addition, in such a model, F atom would have an unpaired
electron, making the molecule an unstable free radical.
Reason #4
And furthermore, the F atom wouldn't have a stable octet in
such a model, which defeats the purpose of forming the
structure in the 1st place.
-------------------------------------
CuO reacting with NH3 :
The oxide anion (ie. the base) abstracts a proton from NH3
molecule (ie. the acid), generating first the OH- ion and NH2- ion.
These two anions, together with four other NH3 molecules,
act as ligands to donate dative bonds to the Cu2+ ion, generating
an octahedral complex ion.
Another possibility is that the OH- abstracts a further proton
from another NH3 molecule (since liquid ammonia used means NH3 is
present in large excess), generating H2O and another NH2- ligand.
In such an octahedra complex ion, two ligands are NH2-, one is
the H2O generated, and 3 are NH3 molecules.
The resulting complex ion should still be deep blue in colour,
or a slight variant* of the deep blue colour of the usual
tetraaminecopper(II) complex ion, since the Cu2+ ion remains as
Cu2+, and the ligands are similar*.
(* Wikipedia out "spectrochemical series" for "strong field vs
weak field" ligands)
CuO + 6NH3 --> Cu(NH2)(OH)(NH3)4
or
CuO + 6NH3 --> Cu(NH2)2(H2O)(NH3)3