Hi ultimaonline.
I recently did a question on why pka of peroxyethanoic acid(as
shown in picture) is more than pka of ethanoic acid. my school
answer is :The negative charge on oxygen in CH3CO2-
is very effectively dispersed through delocalisation within
the ‒COO- π system. However, the anion CH3CO3- is not able to
delocalise its electrons
over the C=O group. Hence, CH3CO2‒ is more stable than
CH3CO3-.
May I ask if it is correct to say that since the extra o atom in
the peroxyethanoic acid has p orbital, resonance of pi
electron cloud can also form in the ‒COOO- group in the conjugate
base of peroxyethanoic acid , the lone pair of the
extra o atom increases electron density of pi electron cloud, hence
intensifies the negative charge of conjugate base , making it
more unstable, extent of dissociation of peroxyethanoic
acid is lesser, ka is smaller, pka is bigger. correct me
if im wrong in my reasoning. thank you.


Hi Rapidestlime, to fully understand the answer to this question,
why the negative formal charge on the terminal O atom in COOO-
cannot be delocalized by resonance, you have to go beyond just
simply the idea of sideways overlapping of p orbitals making
resonance delocalization of pi electrons and hence delocalization
of a formal charge possible.
You actually have to draw out the resonance contributors in each
case, ie. COO- vs COOO-, to explain why resonance delocalization of
the negative formal charge is not possible in COOO-. Because unless
it involves complete delocalization around a ring, ie. aromaticity,
otherwise, lone pairs (in unhybridized p orbitals) cannot
delocalize into being lone pairs on other atoms by resonance, lone
pairs can only at most delocalize into pi bond pairs.
In the case of COOO-, the central O atom's lone pair occupying a
unhybridized p orbital can indeed delocalize by resonance as a pi
bond pair with the acyl sp2 C atom, which can indeed accept the pi
bond pair (which happens in the resonance stabilized COO- conjugate
base) without having to expand its octet (which it can't do so,
being in period 2), because the C=O pi bond can simultaneously
delocalize into a lone pair on the O atom.
However, the lone pair on the terminal O atom bearing the
negative formal charge in the COOO- conjugate base, *cannot* at the
same time delocalize by resonance to form a pi bond with the
central O atom in any resonance contributor (ie. regardless of
whether the central O atom has delocalized it's lone pair unto the
acyl C atom or not), because the central O atom is unable to
accommodate an expanded octet configuration (forcing the central O
atom to accept a pi bond from the terminal O- atom will result in
the central O atom having either 2 lone pairs + 3 bond pairs in a
resonance contributor, or 1 lone pair + 4 bond pairs in another
resonance contributor, which cannot be done because period 2
elements only have 1 x 2s orbital and 3 x 2p orbitals, and do not
have vacant, energetically accessible 3d orbitals to accommodate an
expanded octet).
If (like all other H2 students) you've no experience with
drawing resonance contributors and hybrids, the above will be tough
for you to understand. It's best if you get your school teacher or
private tutor to draw them out for you.
Of course, Cambridge will be delighted if you are able to do so
(ie. draw out the resonance contributors and hybrids) as part of
your explanation, but at the very least, giving your school's (ie.
Singapore JCs') simpler answer will be sufficient to obtain the 1
mark for this question. No worries, when the question goes beyond
the H2 syllabus and it's not fair to everyone*, it's still fair :
it's a bell-curve afterall.
*Of course, H3 Chem, Olympiad Chem, and BedokFunland JC students
will know how to draw out resonance contributors and hybrids. It's
still fair because they've put in additional effort to understand
Chem deeper. Why else join H3 Chem, Olympiad Chem, and BedokFunland
JC?