theres a high chance u wil render wad i say as ineffective…tis
may occur on 2 grounds…1) most of my logical reasoning starts off
wif the person believing theres a God/creator…but dunno which one
to believe in…2) like i said earlier, wad may seem logical to me
may nt be logical to u…
u may have heard tis b4 but i am stil going to say it…thru my
10yrs as a christian, i have nt met anyone who became a christian
thru logically understanding the existence of God n why the
christian God is the rite one. in fact, i have met ppl who got more
confused abt God when they tried to search for logical reasonings
to explain His existence. u may nt like tis but when it comes to
believing in any god, faith must play a part…in fact, to believe in
sth often involves faith…knowledgeable christians i have met
usually became christian without much logical reasoning n then
became very knowledgeable after they converted. the interesting
thing is as they grew in knowledge, they didnt get more confused.
tis is unlike those who sought for logical reasoning b4 becoming
christian. of cuz u can choose to disagree wif tis, but tats wad i
have observed in these past 10yrs…
So may I replace the euphemistic word "faith", with some
not-so-nice word like "superstition", and thereby conclude that
those who converted do so on the basis of superstition? Of course
there are numerous people who feel spiritually fulfilled after
converting, but what about those who don't? You are painting a
one-sided and impeccable scenario here. Are there no people who
"degenerated" upon conversion? And for those who feel spiritually
fulfilled, like you, I guess, is taking a step into the religion a
mere runaway from reality, or is it something really true? Just a
thought for you to muse about.
Had the arguments against evolution been strong and convincing
enough, people would have dismissed the theory of evolution.
Whichever the case is, scientific information is always in a
constant flux. For all you know, in the future, the evolution
theory could be improved on, abolished and replaced with a new
theory, blah blah blah. Maybe there would be evidence to show
wthether God (and which kind of God) exists or not. So you dont
need to take the evolution theory as the only source of explanation
to the creation of life. Its rather inaccurate to say I dont
believe in God, btw. Its perhaps your lack of scientific
inclination which prod you to seek non-scientific explanations for
the creation of life. There is nothing wrong with that, to each his
own anyway!
Cheers! :)