Naturally, information of Obama's pay is not
public, but here's an estimate
Books written:
The State of Black America, The Audacity of Hope, Dreams from My
Father, Change We Can Believe In, Barack Obama in His Own Words
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/barackobama/3385579/Barack-Obama-victory-fulfils-Scottish-publishers-dream.html
Quote: The two books [The Audacity of Hope, Dreams from My
Father] together have now sold more than three million copies in
the US and are set to be translated into dozens of languages
Pricing - Audacity of hope: list price USD19.95
(http://www.amazon.ca/gp/product/0307237702?ie=UTF8&tag=beyotherhet-20&linkCode=as2&camp=15121&creative=390961&creativeASIN=0307237702)
Pricing - Dreams from My Father: list price CND32.00
[USD27.25445]
(http://www.amazon.ca/Dreams-My-Father-Story-Inheritance/dp/0307383415/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1306921525&sr=1-2)
Profit: 3,000,000 x USD[(19.95 +27.25)/2] = USD70,800,000
I can't be bothered to continue this with the other 3 books, but
obviously its a profit. Furthermore this is only 2008, not
accounting 3 years worth of sales. Let's say maybe manufacturing
costs cut this number in half
USD70,800,000/2 = USD35,400,000
PM Lee's "Hard Truths" sales - estimated
100,000(http://forums.sgclub.com/singapore/sold_out_hard_333263.html)
Pricing - S$40.00
Total profits: 100,000 x S$40.00 = S$4,000,000 =
USD3,124,536
Now, not accounting for the workshops and talks he gives as
well, let's compare Obama to PM Lee:
Obama's profits per year: [USD35,400,000/4(number of years on
sale)] + USD400,000(official pay) = USD9,250,000
PM Lee's profits per year: S$3,000,000(USD2,343,402) +
USD3,124,536 = USD5,467,938
Therefore Obama's profits > PM Lee's profits
Keep in mind that Obama's profits is a very big underestimate
noting that other books and other sources of income are not
included into the equation. All conversion rates are used are
accurate to the time frame in context, used with the converter
(http://www.oanda.com/currency/converter/)
CONCLUSION
I don't care if you tl;dr the whole thing, the point is that
saying that the ministers are paid more than Obama is an invalid
argument from the start. Is this enough proof? :)