i think the talk about foreigners should shift towards how many
is the right numbers....and work your way down to who should be
in.......
Personnally i am not against foreigners but i think there has to
be a gauge of numbers.
I worked in a global company that basically has foreign
scientist that required their expertised and many other regional
folks to support and speak local languages in Japs, Kor, thai
etc.
I also know that Singapore is gear toward extremely high
computational skills set and specialized skills. I
think Singapore has serious structure
unemployment......these are mid age that is hard
to upgrade.
The main problems is the way they solve the
problems....basically it doesn't solved any....Period.
Arapahoe
I understand what you meant and I agree with you
statements. I have this to add and I give cases I know
.
Singapore wants to ride above the intensive global competitions
by going high tech, high value, innovation based.
We gets China/India Phds to come for research and study. They
come because the money conversion rate is good but these
people are also smart to know that end of their slogs, the
results belong to the uni or research institution or company
or Singapore.
So? They did what they need to get by and bring the 'real'
results to China/India for further refinement or mass
production (and cheaper cost).
Reap their own rewards! Why give it to Singapore?. Even if
it is blatant copyright infringement, so what? How is Singapore or
Singapore govt going to catch them?
So you see, we have been talking and talking, pumping money
and money and high profiling and profiling high tech,
high value, innovation based industries but really where
are the results so far?